Support for Car Talk is provided by:

Discussion Rules

Login
Submit a Car Question

Time and distance: light-second

Dear Tom and Ray, In your recent show you equated a listeners' odometer miles to the distance between the earth and the moon which as you know is not constance. A more relative measure is a "light second" at 186,000 miles per hour. So when a vhicle travels a light second, it's time to rotate the air in the tires. Miles and meters are so earth bound, univeral speed is the way to measure things! So a vehicle travels 264000 nano light seconds at 5 miles per hour. Or something like that.. Love the show.

Posted by: djthompson
by: oldschool 08/08/2009 6:26:42 PM
Top 20 Contributor
Re: Time and distance: light-second
Speed of light 186,000 miles per SECOND not hour. Light second=distance light travels in one second.
by: djthompson 08/08/2009 7:00:41 PM
Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
Right 186000 miles is equal to one light second. So a nano light second is 10 E-9 miles or .000186 miles in one second or .6696 miles in one hour (times 3600). 26.4 nano light seconds equals about 17 miles per hour. (i was off by a couple of wave lengths)
by: Caller X 08/10/2009 12:01:23 PM
Re: Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
NO. No. No. NO number of lightseconds equals any number of miles per hour. You simply cannot mix units like that. Please step away from the keyboard.
by: VDCdriver 08/10/2009 12:09:54 PM
Top 20 Contributor
Re: Time and distance: light-second

"the moon which as you know is not constance"


I have always referred to the moon as Emily, but your family may have referred to that heavenly body by a different name.

;-))
by: texases 08/10/2009 12:33:38 PM
Top 20 Contributor
Re: Time and distance: light-second
Like the others said, light-second is a unit of length (186,000 miles), not velocity. Coincidentally, a nano light second is equal almost exactly to one foot! (11.8 inches, to be more exact).
Updated: 08/10/2009 01:39:48 PM
Flag comment as inappropriate
by: djthompson 08/10/2009 3:04:52 PM
Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
So 5.8 K nanoLight seconds = 1 mile therefor 300 K nanolight seconds is ~ 50 miles and 300K nanolight seconds is 50 miles per hour. If you are measuring velocity, but the questions were odometer reading in relation to the distance to the moon. That distince is changing. But a light second, 186000 miles is a constant distance.
by: texases 08/10/2009 3:07:16 PM
Top 20 Contributor
Re: Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
"therefor 300 K nanolight seconds is ~ 50 miles and 300K nanolight seconds is 50 miles per hour"

How do you do that? If 300K nano light seconds is ~ 50 miles, then it's not 50 miles per hour, right?
by: djthompson 08/10/2009 3:23:10 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
It's 50 miles. If you travel thta distance in one hour, it's 300k nanolight seconds per hour. As pointed out above its a distance not a time but a constant distance.
by: texases 08/10/2009 3:49:36 PM
Top 20 Contributor
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
OK, then you should have said "therefor 300 K nanolight seconds is ~ 50 miles and 300K nanolight seconds traveled in an hour is 50 miles per hour"
Updated: 08/10/2009 03:53:56 PM
Flag comment as inappropriate
by: djthompson 08/10/2009 6:53:51 PM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
I stand adjusted. I was mixing terms trying to create a speedo that was calibrated to a light-second.
by: bliddel 08/22/2009 12:49:13 PM
Re: Time and distance: light-second
A light nanosecond is a speed times a time, which becomes a distance. We don't calibrate distances on a speedometer. Those are reserved for odometers.

A light second is 186,072 miles (in a vacuum anyway).

We could calibrate a speedometer in terms of the speed of light (referred to as "C", just as military interceptor jets have mach indicators referenced to the speed of sound. Such a speedometer, instead of reading 50 Miles per hour would read 7.46426 * 10^-8 C. Not a reading that would be ready meaningful to most people, which is probably why we stick to miles per hour.
by: oldschool 08/22/2009 12:55:33 PM
Top 20 Contributor
Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
If my airspeed was indicating 50mph ,well I would scan some of the other gagues,maybe check my harness (bailout time).
by: rpstrong 08/10/2009 4:15:53 PM
Re: Re: Time and distance: light-second
Rear Admiral Grace Hopper, a computer pioneer, used to hand out "nanoseconds" at her lectures - wires cut to just over 11 inches.

RSS
Powered by Public Interactive