<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Detroit does it again: Lots of SUVs, few high MPG compacts"]]></title>
		<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/12202.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Detroit does it again: Lots of SUVs, few high MPG compacts"]]></description>
		<generator>Public Action</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well put; one GM executive admitted that one day in 10 they build a car as good as Toyota and Honda do. And that's only assembly quality. At this time Toyota's overall labour cost is $45/hr and the US manufacturers are still in the mid fifties even after all the rollbacks. GM's hourly cost in Canada is still $70/hr. and some drastic adjustment is in order. But the most important thing is the net assembly hours required per car, in which Japanese manufacturers are better as well.<br/> <br/> Don't get me started on design quality; a person who shaves a few dollars off a part, regardless of the consequences (gaskets, etc.),in a US owned plant, is still a hero. Toyota does this all the time, but the quality either goes up or stays the same!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1108424</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1108424</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 8 May 2008 10:33:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ As for quality; I've been a trucker for many years and have been in Honda, Toyota and Ford plants. If the work I see around docks is an indication, Ford is lucky to get 2-3 hours work a day out of the union workers. Not to mention the way I am treated. <br/> <br/> In 1972 I was looking for an economy car. I tested the Datsun 510, Pinto and Vega. I thought at the time that if this was all the U.S. could come up with after a decade or two of VW taking sales.... The Datsun was W A Y ahead in refinement.<br/> <br/> The management and unions are equally at fault I suppose. That said, It's amazing that some desirable cars are produced: Corvette, Caddy CTS, the new Malibu(according to tests I hear),Buick Enclave. Still work to be done on economy cars, though. Not much changed since 1972!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1107056</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1107056</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 7 May 2008 23:54:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The other point they made was that engines had gotten much more powerful, and therefore used more gas. If we had the same power to weight ratio in our vehicles as 20 years ago, today's cars would be much more economical. Up till this year, horsepower sold, and economy be damned! Watch the comimng changes now that oil has passed $120/barrel and gas will soon be $4 everywhere. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1104644</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1104644</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 7 May 2008 10:15:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ As Tom and Ray said in their recent PBS special, U.S. car engines keep getting more efficient--but the vehicles they power keep getting heavier. We recently purchased a Prius and are quite impressed with how well it rides and handles, even on highways and in the snow. The only other car I'd consider buying now is a Mini Cooper Clubman.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1102812</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1102812</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 7 May 2008 00:46:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>So is it a guess? Sure... and guesses can be wrong (that's why Consumer Reports has removed their automatic recommendation for Toyota). But it is no more of a guess than it is with any Honda or Toyota model....&nbsp;
		</blockquote><br/> <br/> What I use is PAST history...GM's history in build a reliable vehicle for the past 30 years is MISERABLE. Where as Honda, Toyota and Nissan haven't been. They've proven to be far more reliable then GM. There's guesses and then there's EDUCATED GUESSES.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1108434</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1108434</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 8 May 2008 10:50:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It helps if the guts of the car have been in production for years.  The Fusion uses a V6 that has been around since 1996 and an I4 that has been around since 2002.  A lot of it is guesswork based on initial failures, which do tend to historically correlate well with long term reliability as well....<br/> <br/> So is it a guess?  Sure... and guesses can be wrong (that's why Consumer Reports has removed their automatic recommendation for Toyota).  But it is no more of a guess than it is with any Honda or Toyota model....]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100828</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100828</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 13:30:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br/> <blockquote>Try the new Malibu LTZ (?) or the top of the line Ford Fusion.&nbsp;
		</blockquote><br/> <br/> How can you possibly if a 1yo car is reliable????<br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100820</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100820</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 13:22:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Of course!  But it depends on the angle.  The Malibu is especially easy, but the Accord and Camry appear to be about the same now.  I guess that Hyundai will have to change the front end of the Sonata if they want it to look exactly like an Accord, though.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1105220</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1105220</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 7 May 2008 12:14:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "IMOO I find the new Malibu just as good looking as a new Camry or Accord & I am nowhere near 60"<br/> <br/> Can you actually tell any off them apart from more than 10 feet away?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1102219</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1102219</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 22:15:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ IMOO I find the new Malibu just as good looking as a new Camry or Accord & I am nowhere near 60]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1102212</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1102212</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 22:03:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well you didn't *say* "top-of-the-line".   :)   You just said "the Fusion"... :)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100823</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100823</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 13:24:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm not offended, but then again I stand by my statement. The top of the line or V6 Fusions are NOT available with a manual transmission. My original reply was to Docnick and the "top of the line" Ford Fusion he brought up. <br/> <br/> Having the option of a manual is a big deal to me, and also tells me what kind of person the manuacturer believes is buying the car. If I want a stick in a Honda with a V6, or a BMW with a V8, they give me that choice. If ford wants to woo people who are driving enthusiasts or at least give the image that someone who enjoys driving might consider their car they need to make certain options available.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100654</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100654</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 12:42:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Please, address those ignorant statements, that's what this forum is for. Everyone's entitled to an opinion.<br/> <br/> Unless you're referring to MY statements, of course :)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100616</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100616</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 12:15:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ FYI, you can get a manual transmission on a Ford Fusion with the four cylinder - always have been able to.....<br/> <br/> I won't even address the other completely ignorant statements in this entire thread (not a personal attack, Dave G... just pointing out how out of touch the consumer is with the offerings)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100434</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1100434</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 11:37:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If you find a Malibu exciting you must be over 60 ;) As for the Fusion it's a good reliable car and I've checked out one in person, but the interior doesn't measure up to the imports and the panel gaps on the body are pretty big. It just seems bland to me and last time I checked they don't offer a manual transmission. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098853</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098853</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 23:50:16]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm waiting for quality and long lasting vehicles from Detroit; you want an exiting vehicle? Try the new Malibu LTZ (?) or the top of the line Ford Fusion. These are at least as exciting as your Nissan. Cadillac has a really good road machine as well.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098635</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098635</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 21:03:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I really wish the US made a vehicle that got me excited. Everything seems so dull. I want to know why they keeping making duds? Haven't they lost enough money. When they wake up (which I hope is soon) I would be glad to trade in my Nissan.       ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098616</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098616</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 20:30:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hybrid Toyota should make this stock!!!<br/> <br/> 100 per gallon with gas and electrical<br/> <br/> <a href="http://www.calcars.org/" target="_blank" >http://www.calcars.org/</a><br/> <br/> All of the US based Automakers have been make $$$ and not having any concerns about gas mileage or the health of the planet<br/> <br/> Now that gas is heading to 4, or 5 or 6 dollars a gallon Opps<br/> <br/> GM Makes Hummers and Crush the eletical car<br/> <br/> Now the whish that this could be reversed<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098415</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098415</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 19:53:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ pweber]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Yes, they have been.  They have design rules that prevent them from being innovators.  That may be changing with the introduction of the new Malibu.  The design lead was interviewed in one of the major car magazines.  He said that GM executive management gave him authorization to skip the design rules to come up with a real competitor to the Camry and Accord.  He did.  I'd like to think that GM learned something important from this smart move.  Stay tuned and we'll see.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098614</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1098614</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 20:28:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>It takes time to change production to smaller cars. First they have to recognize tht sales are down on the SUVs (they have).&nbsp;
		</blockquote><br/> <br/> Problem I see with Detroit is they move very very slow to react to current trend....with the exception of Chryco. They were the leaders in the 80's and 90's with the first MiniVan...First Mid-size FWD vehicle...Too bad their quality was cr*p. GM likes to keep a certain model until way past it's prime. They are very very slow to change designs. Toyota, Nissan and Honda change MUCH MUCH faster....and seem to hit the mark a lot more times. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097434</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097434</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 13:52:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It takes time to change production to smaller cars.  First they have to recognize tht sales are down on the SUVs (they have).  They they have to see increased demand for smaller cars in their product line.  Once they max out production at a particular factory, they have to bring on additional capacity at other factories.  It takes a while, and it depends on whether anyone likes their small cars.  The new Malibu seems to be well appreciated by the car reviewers.  Maybe that can translate into acceptance by the public.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097414</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097414</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 13:12:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ i also buy used cars only - i prefer bmw, mercedes, toyo and nissan. the last car i purchased i broke one of my cardinal rules - i purchased american a 95 buick park ave w/ 80,000 miles. i got what i considered to be a great deal 50% of the private seller blue book. and since i only drive 6 or 7 k per year what could go wrong, especially since this 1 owner car was maintained at the local buick dealer. (yes i had a mechanic check it out prior to purchase) omg in 6K miles i have spent 140% of what i paid for it. and the mechanics all tell me the same thing. "yes that's normal, that part was a bad design and always breaks" the last american car i purchased (also the last new car i purchased) a 1990 jeep cherokee. what a piece of crap that was. between the thing breaking down all the time and the dealer blaming me cause he didn't want to honor the warranty. since i got rid of the jeep in 92, i've had 6 mercedes sedans, a bmw 3 series conv, 2 toyo land cruisers and my current pos buick. all of the imports were purchased with miles over 100k and ran great. most of the imports i sold after driving for a year or so for more than i paid for them, with very little maint. except of course the buick w/ half the miles. i would love to see the big 3 get back to profitability, but it probably won't happen until they improve the reliability of the vehicles, and the perception of reliability. also when you pay people $30 something per hour and they still can't take pride in their work, your not going to produce a quality product. now don't get all pissey about what i just said, not everyone is like that, but if the majority of your crew doesn't put forth the effort the minority won't be able to cover it. i lived in detroit until the bottom of the economy fell out, and while there i got to know a lot of people in the industry including the german design team that developed the ford 500. quite a few of the 3rd shift that produced the 500 (after drinking 5 or 6 hours) managers who looked for ways to stick it to the rank and file. line employees that used to laugh about putting scrap metal inside door panels so the cars would rattle, and urinating on the carpets so when summer came along - pew. i could go on and on but i'm done. thanks i'll keep my used imports.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1095819</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1095819</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 May 2008 22:46:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm definitely not one of those people who will pay a lot for your used import, because I think it's ridiculous that people list and buy used import cars for that much. I can always find a domestic that's been taken better care of (because you don't just "put gas in and drive" a domestic), much cheaper to buy, and cheaper to fix if I do have problems (and they all do, it's a crapshoot with used cars, of any make, in my experience). <br/> <br/> I don't buy new, so resale value is rarely an issue for me, either. <br/> <br/> I always laugh when I think of friends/family who've paid more for their one used import vehicle, than I've paid for 2 domestic vehicles that are much more interesting to drive and look at. And their ownership costs are always higher than mine. I really don't see the attraction.<br/> <br/> My opinion of course, to each their own.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097431</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097431</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 13:44:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well, I am on the other end of the spectrum. I would be the one looking for the used car. I usually go by what was well maintained rather than if it was a domestic or import car.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094227</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094227</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 May 2008 12:45:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm not offended by the import mileage because after 5 years when I get my next car people will actually want my import and pay me a lot for it unlike the Impala which no one really wants. Take a look on Craigslist-I see 10-12 year old Hondas going for 1/3 of what they cost new. If you find a 12 year old American car it's worth about 15% of what you paid. Specialty models exempt of course.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094221</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094221</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 May 2008 12:33:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree. I don't see that the line ups are all that different. <br/> <br/> Chevy: <a href="http://www.chevrolet.com/lineup/" target="_blank" >http://www.chevrolet.com/lineup/</a><br/> Toyota: <a href="http://www.toyota.com/" target="_blank" >http://www.toyota.com/</a><br/> <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094026</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094026</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 May 2008 11:58:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A pair of serious questions.<br/> If one is offended by heavyweight Detroit made pickups and SUVs then are you equally offended by Toyota 4Runners and Tacomas, Nissan Titans and Armadas, etc.?<br/> <br/> <br/> A number of my neighbors own late model Chevrolet Impalas and every single one of these people are happy with their vehicles. They state the fuel mileage they get is in the 29-32 MPG range on the highway. (And before it's brought up, I know these people very well and they are not liars.)<br/> If one is offended by the mileage these cars get then are you equally offended by the mileage a new Camry gets or especially a new Subaru; none of which get near what the Impala does? (This in spite of Subaru proclaiming themselves the greenest car company).]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1092612</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1092612</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 May 2008 01:08:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Reliability in Europe is a relative thing; cars that were exported as being reliable  (Ford Cortina, GM Vauxhall, French Simcas, Relaults, Citroens, Fiats, etc) in Europe performed rather dismally in North America. Some reasons:<br/> <br/>  1. Americans drive a lot more<br/> <br/> 2. Europe has ridgid ammual inspections<br/> <br/> 3. Americans are less punctual about checking things and maintenance<br/> <br/> 4. Climate variations in the US are extreme compared to Europe<br/> <br/> Americans virtually live in cars; and a good number of them were conceived in cars!<br/> <br/> The Japanese leanred the hard way, and withdrew their initial offerings until the bugs had been worked out. Nissan even had one of their engineers live with a US familiy for a full year to learn about the abuse US cars get.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1105814</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1105814</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 7 May 2008 16:43:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ the european ford focus was voted most reliable car in 2003!i drive a 2002 ford puma in england and its been totally reliable in the last 6 years.most european fords are very reliable also.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097425</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097425</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 13:34:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "Look up Euro Ford Focus, Mondeo - both excellent cars and very different to the US versions, or Renault, Peugeot, Fiat and best of all Seat. "<br/> <br/> Really tough for me to accept European versions being touted as reliable. The milage requirements is so much less than that of US, only Fiat, Renault etc. could survive there. Please tell me a compact car made in Europe that is as reliable as even an American Ford Focus let alone a Toy/Honda/Sub etc. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1092021</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1092021</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 22:42:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I envy you owning 2 1950 Nash automobiles.  I was in elementary school when the Airflyte design came out and I was fascinated by these cars and I still am.  When George Mason introduced the Nash Rambler for the 1950 model year (I think it was in late April or May), he introduced cars that were more expensive than the standard Fords, Chevrolets or Plymouths and the first models were only convertibles and station wagons.  They came well equipped for the times--included a radio and the Nash "Weather Eye" heating system.  Many cars at this time didn't have fresh air heaters--the heater was a recirculating box under the dashboard.  The stripped down Fords and Chevrolets didn't even have a passenger side sunvisor.  The "Country Club" Rambler hardtop wasn't introduced until 1952.  At any rate, the Rambler did survive until 1969.  The Henry J and the Willys were gone by the middle of the 1950's.  The Ramblers that I remember gave the perception of being well-assembled--they didn't have the squeaks and rattles that the other cars had.  Rambler wasn't the only car using the closed drivshaft--Chevrolet used this torque tube drive through the 1954 models and Buick used it through the 1960 model year.  I know that my 1965 Rambler Classic had the enclosed driveshaft, but I think that the Rambler American had gone to an open propeller shaft--I don't remember when.  At the beginning of the 1960's, the Rambler was the 4th best selling car in the nation and had one of the highest resale values.  When American Motors tried to imitate the "Big 3" after George Romney left to become governor of Michican, the quality slipped and the company forgot about its niche in the marketplace.  Remember that VW sales were very small compared to the sales of Fords and Chevrolets.<br/> <br/> I do remember when I was in college that my dad was shopping for a replacement for his 1954 Buick.  After driving the 1960 Buick, he said that he wasn't going to pay $3200 for a four passenger car and went down the street and bought a Rambler Classic.  The fit and finish of the Rambler seemed better than that of the Buick at that time.  I purchased a 1965 Rambler Classic in 1965 and I thought the car seemed to be of higher quality than the Dodge Dart or the Ford Fairlane or Falcon.  I did have to have the transmisison (manual) repaired and it was a pain to drop the rear axle with the closed driveshaft.  When I was ready to replace the Rambler, AMC no longer built what I thought was a quality car.  <br/> <br/> IMHO, it is the perceived quality that sells a car.  The Rambler lost this after the mid-1960's, and, as a result, lost its niche that George Mason and George Romney had established in the marketplace.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097645</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097645</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 15:31:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Quoting Triedaq: "When George Mason was president of Nash, he brought a a small car that was easy on gasoline called the Rambler. The car was well made and it did sell. I don't think that our manufacturers learn much from history."<br/> <br/> Unfortunately the American car buying public didn't seem to care about the Rambler.  Gas was still under 25¢ a gallon. In their FIRST YEAR'S PRODUCTION Chevy's Corvair and Ford's Falcon, which were their first foray into small car production,  combined to sell more than Nash/AMC's Rambler's did during the previous ten year run.  <br/> <br/> For the most part, no one seemed to care that the Rambler existed. Don't get me wrong, I still have my two bigger 1950 Nashes, and had a '54 Rambler Country Club hardtop a few years ago.  Sloppy handling, weak front suspension systems, enclosed drive shafts and all. Were they well made?  I really don't think so. I wonder what percentage of '50 to '60 Nashes compared to '50 to '60 Fords still exist. <br/> <br/> <br/> 1960 First year Corvair 187696<br/> 1960 First year Ford Falcon  435676<br/> Totals for that 1st year, 623372<br/> <br/> 1950 Nash Rambler 11428<br/> 1951 Nash Rambler 69953<br/> 1952 Nash Rambler 53000<br/> 1952 Nash Rambler 30260<br/> 1954 Nash Rambler 36230<br/> 1955 Nash Rambler 56023<br/> 1956 Nash Rambler 46107<br/> 1957 Rambler American  68757<br/> 1958 Rambler American 30640<br/> 1959 Rambler American 91494<br/> 1960 Rambler American 120983<br/> Ten year total 614795<br/> <br/> When they quit making the Corvair and Falcon,  AMC was still pumping out small cars.  They were not big sellers either. It seems to me to be rather like they wanted to be the only car company out there, and wanted the public to love their outdated cars, no matter what.  And THEN came the Renault Alliance.  The worst of two worlds. And now the US Air Farce wants the French to help build the new tanker, but I digress.  <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094631</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1094631</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 May 2008 14:29:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Agree....good seats and reliability and you're 90% on your way to an automotive success. DAH....That's why the Ford Ranger keeps plugging along W/O change. It's reliability, is the only thing going for it, and they still keep selling the little buggers. IMHO, one of the few unrecognized long term Ford success stories. The MODEL A of compact trucks. It used the revamped Pinto 4 cyl. for years; that's how old it is.<br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1092025</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1092025</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 22:50:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ U.S. manufacturers not only miss the boat, they don't even seem to know that the boat exists.  I remember when the VW Beetle became popular in the late 1950's.  A person had to wait 3 to 6 months for delivery.  The design of the VW went back to 1939.  The cars came in when the U.S. manufacturers were building bigger and more gas thirsty cars and loading them with accessories.  The VW Beetle didn't offer an automatic transmission, didn't offer or need power steering, didn't offer air conditioning and had a lousy heater.  What the VW did offer was low maintenance, good gasoline mileage for the time, and a perception that the vehicle was a quality automobile. The price of the VW Beetle was not much less than the bottom of the line Chevrolet 150, the Plymouth Plaza, or the Ford Mainline, all strippo models. I can remember in the early 1960's that a 4 year old VW Beetle and a 4 year old Cadillac would fetch about the same price.<br/> <br/> IMHO, Chrysler corporation had a great opportunity to get on the boat with its Neon.  Had the car given the impression that it was a quality car and established a record for reliability, it could have been the next VW Beetle.  When George Mason was president of Nash, he brought a a small car that was easy on gasoline called the Rambler.  The car was well made and it did sell.  I don't think that our manufacturers learn much from history.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1090422</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1090422</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 11:48:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Triedaq]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[  "I didn't see a post from you last year warning that domestic manufacturers should be making more compact cars"  <br/> <br/>    If you read back through all my messages, you will find comments to that end a number of times.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1091212</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1091212</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 17:10:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I didn't see a post from you last year warning that domestic manufacturers should be making more compact cars, hindsight is the most facile of skills to attain. US Manufacturers were responding to market demands - large powerful and gas hungry SUV's. Those manufacturers that did produce fuel efficient compacts didn't see any record sales figures, Honda et al have that market sewn up and a good competitive car isn't going to be developed in a couple of years.

High gas prices are a significant result of the sub prime crunch along with other production and market factors, seems no-one foresaw sub prime either. Speculators have now re-directed their cash into energy commodities instead of the burn't out Mortgage Backed Securities market, hence driving prices up.

]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1090012</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1090012</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 09:22:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ They dont make a good fuel efficient car. However they are very good at making big things. Dont say that they have missed the boat completely, they make more efficient large engines than they used to. The gas mileage on a V8 is now in the 20s, it used to be in the single digits.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1089817</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1089817</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 08:35:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ fawadquazi]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ my nephew drives a 2007 seat leon fr tdi,here in england,it has a vw 2.0 tdi engine with 170 bhp!it does 130mph,and up to 50mpg when cruising!build quality is excellent also.vw needs to export seats to the usa,you guys would love them!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097420</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1097420</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 5 May 2008 13:27:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ still JUNK,same BUILD QUALITY, don't get me started on renault.  (another piece of crap,I do not care where you BUY the car(JUNK)  M/O!<br/> Rubbish. you said it I didn't lmao<br/> <br/> maico.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1091838</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1091838</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 21:41:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ maico 490]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Rubbish.

Look up Euro Ford Focus, Mondeo - both excellent cars and very different to the US versions, or Renault, Peugeot, Fiat and best of all Seat.

These are all good small, economical cars sold in very demanding and competitive markets. You need to do a little research before making such sweeping and uninformed statements.

I for one would love to get my hands on a Seat Leon.
]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1090021</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1090021</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 09:54:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[     You need to learn about current automotive diesel technology.  Now that the US has finally gotten past the trucking and fuel industry and mandated clean (ULSD) fuel, we will be getting the clean small diesels that have been available and running clean for years in Europe. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1107814</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1107814</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 8 May 2008 07:20:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No. Oh, please, no. Please park those sooty, dirty diesels! In exchange for roughly 20% better efficiency, diesels put out FAR more soot that even the worst gasoline auto! Heck, you could deliberately dismantle the smog equip on a gas car and it'd STILL be cleaner! Europe is stuck with diesels because of taxing policy; thankfully, the US doesn't have that problem.<br/> <br/> In my home town, the buses were all converted over to natural gas for environmental reasons, despite the head of the authority admitting they'd now have to burn more energy. As far as I'm concerned, they got it right.<br/> <br/> Buy a small, gasoline-powerdd car and just drive it 20% less!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1105253</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1105253</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 7 May 2008 13:08:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Tough to disagree....the Focus being an exception still doesn't have the reliability. Where are the compact diesels America ? The first one to come out with a compact diesel suitable for the US and in big supply for under $16 K will have a Model A reincarnate. Sit there and let VW have the onle legit offering is discraceful. Until EVs come on board, diesels will  rule the road. Honda and Subaru think so while GM and Ford seem to have nothing in the plan. Just rebadge Toyotas, Mazdas and throw in a few Korean cars and that's the US plan.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1088213</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1088213</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 23:13:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mconn]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Domestic cars are garbage,followed by european.  M/O! <br/> <br/> maico]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1087820</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1087820</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 21:19:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Quoting Wha Who: "Comparing todays cars from Detroit to a Model A Ford is absurd!"<br/> <br/> Gas mileage and drivability were not mentioned in Mr Mehan's OP.  He said that the Model A was the last car to truly address the market.  I believe that is a true statement.  It replaced the very outdated Model T.  It was a lot better competition for offereings from other car makers of the era. <br/> <br/> And yes, there is a Model A in the building in my backyard.  I've also owned Model <br/> T's tho the last was produced when my parents were kids.  Have you driven an old Ford lately?   ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1093817</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1093817</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 4 May 2008 10:30:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Chevrolet Cobalt 24/33; Chevrolet Malibu 22/30; Chrysler Sebring 21/30; Dodge Avenger 21/30; Ford Focus 24/35; Pontiac Vibe 26/33; Pontiac G5 24/33; Pontiac G6 22/30.

Mr. Meehan; have you ever driven a Model A Ford; not one that is restored to new condition but one typical of those in daily use with some accumulated mileage?  You and Consumer Reports would have a conniption fit regarding vibration, noise and a general feeling of overall looseness at highway speeds if you have.  Cars today are infinitely much better regardless of brand or national origin.

Comparing todays cars from Detroit to a Model A Ford is absurd!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1087434</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1087434</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 19:59:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Wha Who?]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The interesting thing is US automakers have very efficient models abroad that sell well across the globe in other markets. They need to either trickle these models in here or the knowledge and they will remain competitive. <br/> <br/> SUV's were a great thing as the profit margin is/was substantial vs a low priced non luxury small car.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1086844</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1086844</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 15:33:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ They certainly hit the market right with SUVs an PUs.  They sold a lot of them over the past decade or two.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1086834</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1086834</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 15:14:43]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Beadsandbeads]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[    You make some good points there.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1089414</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1089414</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 3 May 2008 06:44:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Joseph_E_Meehan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Detroit does it again!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ As long as Ford pulls stunts like they have on the last 2 F250's with diesel engines in them, they are setting theirself up to loose their market on the last remaining strong hold.  They gave up on the 6 liter trucks trying to fix that mess, they couldn't possibly have done their R&D on that mess, they counted on the first year buyers doing it for them and by the 4th year when they still hadn't worked out the bugs on it blamed the owners for the way they drove or used their trucks for the problems.  Then they came out with this new animal that requires hours and hours of additional labor time to do the simplest repair on the engine because they want to jack the cab of the truck to do it.  People won't put up with that.  They expect to have to do repairs, what they don't expect is having to spend $2000 on a $200 glow plug job because it now requires 8 hours of labor to get the cab off and on to do the job.  Ford is digging their grave fast.

Dodge's newest Cummins looks like a zoo of hoses and wires under the hood and for what purpose?  I'm glad I bought mine with a pre 07 engine in it and don't have to contend with that mess.  

Detroit needs to figure out how to go back to user servicable vehicles else, there's going to be an open door for someone who can and does produce one.

Skip]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1087822</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1023810.page#1087822</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 21:30:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Skipper]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
