<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Is it time for an FAQ page ?"]]></title>
		<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/12202.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Is it time for an FAQ page ?"]]></description>
		<generator>Public Action</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ My point was that it is possible to argue with someone without questioning their motives, intelligence or by being outright accusatory. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122446</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122446</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 15:58:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nice, but you're addressing a symptom not the problem and are simply rechurning the same discussion that occurs twice a week. If you search for 'water' or 'hydrogen' on this forum there are plenty of threads to expound your view.<br/> <br/> This thread is related to whether or not the forum should continue to address those questions directly, not the question itself.<br/>  <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121219</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121219</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 08:29:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree with many of your points, but mainly I contend that this forum software has been left to languish.  I was really very happy when they simply started letting us add replies inline with the page, rather than popping up a giant box on the screen.  I thought they were going to keep developing and massaging the software so that it'd be more like standard forum software.  As it stands, I don't think that they even have the ability to make a topic "sticky" (maintain its spot at the top of the list of topics, regardless of replies), which is exactly where this proposed FAQ should go.<br/> <br/> Car Talk forum lackeys: hath this forum any upgrades in its future?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1123617</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1123617</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 May 2008 01:14:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ mr_josh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[  An automatic search feature exists at CarTalk's previous site at www.wondir.com (yes, wondir.....not, wonder). Sometime, the search response was pertinent, and sometime, not. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1123453</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1123453</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 23:53:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ hellokit]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Time for a FAQ page? Yes, in addition to some tweaks to the discussion board. A problem with the current search is you put in your problem, specific or not, and tons of related questions and answers come up. The answer could be there but who wants to search through all those posting to find it. So, its easier to just post a new discussion. <br/> <br/> What about of just being able to post a question right off the bat why not make it mandatory to search, but revised, for an answer before being allowed to post a question. If an answer was not found one is asked to highlight ones car make, model, and year followed by categorizing the question and then type the question and submit. Categories predetermined and offered in a drop down menu. However, categories must be kept simple. Categories such as engine, noise & vibration, transmission, brakes, steering and handling, body and paint, heating and cooling, electrical, and other. With car make model and year along with categories a better search could also be had. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1123016</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1123016</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 20:54:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ CTListener]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ just flag any suspect.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1183616</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1183616</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 May 2008 19:22:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ crankwalk5]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "If you've had enough of the watr-for-gas discussions, just ignore them."<br/> <br/> unfortunately it is the "average joe" who is trying to get some glimpse of their autos problems who is suffering from this drivel from these useless and redundantly redundant posts.  i hesitate to even call them questions, since they are just sales pitches disguised as an innocent question.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122627</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122627</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 18:52:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cappy208]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Not at all, you are suggesting that the same subject questions should be individually answered each time and that the same problems (such as Make, model, year) should remain as problems.<br/> <br/> My original suggestion was made to improve the quality and scalability of answers to enquirers. Personally I'm abivalent about an FAQ, I can just ignore the Hyrdogen, Vortex and Snake Oil posts. But then ultimately those posters won't receive an informative response since with the exception of yourself, I'd guess that the majority of responders will tire of answering these questions.<br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122820</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122820</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 19:35:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Where did you get that from?  All I'm suggesting is that we should have a little patience or to ignore the stuff that you know will irritate you. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122814</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122814</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 19:07:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ and answering the same questions from the hip ad infinitum is preferable to a singular subject reference page ? Or should we just refer to previous threads on the same topic and copy / paste the previous dialogue each time that question arises ?<br/> <br/> Perhaps auto manufacturers should omit the publication of owners handbooks and workshop manuals and simply have a help desk to answer owners questions using your concept ?<br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122615</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122615</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 18:14:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Being a regular at this site is a lot like retail sales.  You get someone every day that is unfamiliar with your product and needs education.  Look at it as an opportunity to help someone out, not an imposition on your time.  If you've had enough of the watr-for-gas discussions, just ignore them.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121644</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121644</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 11:55:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Here is one for the FAQ - if ever there is one:<br/> <br/> <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/brn/080502/25295.html?.v=1&.pf=family-home" target="_blank" >http://biz...amily-home</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121611</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121611</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 10:04:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ admitted amateur]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It would help if you could explain what you are talking about. "You've got a shill right now on another thread about yet another performance/gas saving scam; Pulstar spark plugs".  <br/> Where are these accusations coming from?  I don't know anything about these plugs and would suggest doing a lot or research before buying any product that promises increases in fuel economy.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1181813</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1181813</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 May 2008 08:10:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "I don't like seeing anyone getting screwed out of their cash"<br/> <br/> Your words ok4450 and probably the  sentiment of thousands, make that millions, of other people.  And yet one of the biggest scams being foisted on you, me and everyone else in this country is ignored either on purpose or through ignorance that it is even happening to them. I know that you want only discussions of "Anything related to the repair of an internal combustion engine or whatever is attached to it; be it 2 wheels, 4 wheels, or winged", but these internal combustion engines are useful only if we can afford the gas to put into them. Last time I looked it still took gas (or deisel, etc.) to run these machines, which to me, makes gas (and gas PRICES) relevent. Now some people, maybe you, maybe not, will have no problem affording gas at 5 or 6 dollars per gallon.  I suspect most of us will be under a real hardship to do so. So if all Americans are being ripped off by unregulated energy speculators why aren't you and everyone else p****d off about that?  What makes the ripping off of all of us at the gas pump any different than, as you put it "seeing anyone getting screwed out of their cash; no matter if it's a fraudulent auto repair or one of about 8000 bogus gas saving gimmicks?"  Educate yourself to this rip off by doing your own "Search" on the Enron Loophole before you whip off a reply to me.  Then we can talk. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1129613</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1129613</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 May 2008 11:09:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ frontier12]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ What am I afraid of? Certainly not you. Heck, many years ago I was extended an invitation to join an outlaw motorcycle club (not really my cup of tea) so you're not really contributing to my fear factor.<br/> <br/> What threads have I enjoyed in the past? Just about every one of them I've read and that includes ones that I have not responded to. There are a large number of regular posters on this board and I fully enjoy reading their insight on automotive problems.<br/> <br/> What is it that I want to discuss? Anything related to the repair of an internal combustion engine or whatever is attached to it; be it 2 wheels, 4 wheels, or winged.<br/> What is it I do NOT want to see? Shills providing links to scam products which are designed solely to separate the naive and unsuspecting consumer from their dollars. At times posts appear where someone has very obviously been BSed or flat out robbed of their money on an auto repair and this honestly pxxxxx me off. (I'm a volatile guy).<br/> I don't like seeing anyone getting screwed out of their cash; no matter if it's a fraudulent auto repair or one of about 8000 bogus gas saving gimmicks.<br/> <br/> You've got a shill right now on another thread about yet another performance/gas saving scam; Pulstar spark plugs.<br/> <br/> Are those answers clear enough?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121827</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121827</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 12:47:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ok4450]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Interesting response... But, you didn't answer my question. What are you afraid of? What is so hard about answering this question: "I am curious... What threads have you enjoyed in the past? What is it that you do want to discuss?" <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121212</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121212</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 08:05:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I've already emailed them and asked that any post relating to these scams be instantly canned, and make sure the poster also becomes a cannee.<br/> <br/> This site is supposed to be about helping someone with car problems, which are a pain in the neck even on a good day. It's not supposed to be about separating someone from their cash.<br/> If someone chooses to go on any one of a thousand scam sites and get bilked then so be it but the ball should not start rolling here.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1120219</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1120219</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 01:33:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ok4450]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I am curious... What threads have you enjoyed in the past?  What is it that you do want to discuss? ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119812</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119812</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 23:09:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ My point was that it is possible to argue with someone without questioning their motives, intelligence or by being outright accusatory. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122457</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1122457</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 16:17:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Just because many of the responses do not match your particular beliefs (i.e., that you can run a car on water) does not necessarily make them irrational, insinuating, or accusatory. If responses contain factual errors, they can be corrected. If someone is insulting and nasty, or a space and time wasting looney, they can be criticized and even moderated out (everyone knows who I'm talking about, and it's not you, sderekh). Granted, some responders need to be a little more civil, but when someone with an agenda keeps pushing an issue long after it's died,...]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121822</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121822</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 12:35:12]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MrPhil]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Don't worry about spelling.  We convey information the best we can.  BTW, what is wrong with "references"?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1183227</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1183227</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 May 2008 17:56:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Good advice. Especially this point "This subject has already been covered in detail and can be references (sic) on " <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1181811</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1181811</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 May 2008 08:03:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Seems like you don't attend the forum on a regular basis, otherwise you'd know, and no-one is making either insinuations or accusations. Read a few historical posts and you'll get the idea. As for 'objectivity', I believe that nearly all of the responders on this forum strive to provide objective answers to enquiries for help. There is the occasional Troll, but they soon obviate themselves and go away once they're ignored. <br/> <br/> This is a pudding that doesn't need over egging, but as an example a page advising how to pose a question.<br/> <br/> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/> <br/> - Always provide Year, Make, Model, Engine & transmission type (i.e. Auto / Manual) and estimated mileage.<br/> <br/> - Don't use all capitals, it gives us a headache - known as shouting in forum speak.<br/> <br/> - Provide as much information as possible, responders can only provide answers based on the information you give, the better the information - the better the answers you will get.<br/> <br/> - Try to provide feedback of the fix for your problem, it may come in useful for future posters. Saying thanks is gravy.<br/> <br/> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/> <br/> Other suggestions are listed above, an interference engine reference, Dino vs Synth oil discussion, maintenenace intervals among others. With an FAQ area the 'nuggets' from previous posts can be assembled into a single reference page, enquirers can then be referred to that page when they post - I'm not expecting posters to find the page themselves, though they should be able to. Those threads then become write once. read many times, the quality of that specific information can only improve since it is focal and objective.<br/> <br/> Thereafter the question : "Should I be using synthetic oil in my 1998 Honda Accord V6 auto" <br/> <br/> Can be answered : "This subject has already been covered in detail and can be references on <URI>"<br/> <br/> Rational enough ?<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121011</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121011</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 07:18:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'd like to recommend rational discussions without the insinuations and outright accusations. How about some objectivity?  How about coming up with actual hard evidence for your beliefs?  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119690</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119690</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 21:45:40]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I, too, started a discussion question and was told I should have used the "search function". I tried it and there were no topics that helped.  I don't know if that is because it was never discussed, or if the search function doesn't work properly.  If you'd really like to help someone and know the topic has been discussed before... why not tell them exactly where to get the information they are looking for without being rude? For instance, you could tell them the title of the question they are looking for. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1181618</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1181618</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 May 2008 07:58:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sderekh]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I think these posts are getting at a weakness in the search link -- I know when I last had a question I searched everything I could think of to find an answer and found nothing, so I posted it. HEY CAR TALK WEB MASTER! Your community wants help!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1132019</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1132019</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 May 2008 23:16:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ laurencitaND05]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Understood Roadrunner and I took your comment as tongue in cheek anyway.<br/> <br/> Seems like some of the posts on this thread were flagged by an overly sensitive individual, I can hazard a guess who..<br/> <br/> I agree totally with your comments regarding 'lost' features on the forum and my view is if the web masters want to make a public action forum work, they need to listen to their contributors.<br/> <br/> Web design by attrition <really big grin><br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1129620</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1129620</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 May 2008 11:30:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Scudder,<br/>  I was leaning toward sarcasm in that 'swamping' post.<br/> <br/> However, you are making some good points and suggestions.<br/> <br/> In your post below where you outline the need for questioning posters to provide sufficient info has been put forth to the powers that be on this site to no avail. (so far)<br/> <br/> We've seen in the past that injecting info and common sense in a relative post goes practically unnoticed.<br/> <br/> The subjects you covered concerning new questioning posters should (IMHO) be posted as a 'sticky'.<br/> <br/> What I mean is that the required info that you posted here has to be inserted permanently at the start of original posting along with registering BEFORE any posts are made.<br/> <br/> As we all know, there are quite few options that were left behind in the old forum we would like to see reinstated here, BUT after this length of time, I'm wondering if they will ever come to fruition.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1125629</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1125629</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 May 2008 14:46:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Roadrunner]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If you break the posters on this forum into 2 groups ~ enquirers and responders i.e. you, the number of 'hard core' regular responders is very small, probably about 20. That number of emails shouldn't swamp them and if there are enough requests, they'll probably do it.<br/> <br/> After all, the forum URI is 'Car Talk - Public Action'. If the regular responders didn't provide feedback, the forum wouldn't work. Therefore there is no reason why the people who provide that feedback shouldn't have some input as to how it works.<br/> <br/> It can only improve the forum value.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1120814</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1120814</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 06:52:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ You mean......swamp the admins letter box so they don't have time to read anything else eh?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119676</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119676</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 21:30:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Roadrunner]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I posted an enquiry to the webmaster, I guess we'll see have to wait and see what reception it gets. As Amateur stated earlier a Wiki type of site would be ideal since it's colaborative, topically driven and needs minimal admin.<br/> <br/> If you guys really want this, email the enquiries email under Help.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119656</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119656</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 20:32:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ i have some spare three phase here, if i could just get it to the offending key board!  just a little ZAP once in a while!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119643</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119643</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 20:11:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cappy208]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A FAQ section is WAYYYYYYYYYYYYY overdue.<br/> <br/> The search link on this site doesn't work at all. Why? <br/> <br/> I typed in 'tires', nothing. I typed in 'intake manifold gaskets', nothing. I typed in 'sway bars', nothing.<br/> <br/> The typed word(s) just stare back at you. Anyone else get it to work and for how long?<br/> <br/> It worked on the old forum reasonably well, although it wouldn't go back a full year and in some cases it would be nice.<br/> <br/> One other thing I would like to see is a section relating to different vehicles by year/make and model and whether interference or noninterference engines. <br/> <br/> One thing for sure is to have a troll wacker.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119639</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119639</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 20:07:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Roadrunner]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree. The ones about water into gas just really irritate the devil out of me and the one about followers falling off the Mercury was a real hoot. The latter never made any sense to me at all.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119242</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119242</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 16:27:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ok4450]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Perhaps they could make it part of the question filling out part of the thread title before they even make the post. Like little drop down menus for year, make, model, mileage, etc.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121416</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121416</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 09:17:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ bscar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I agree regarding peoples inability to use Search. But if the forum did have an FAQ, irritating questions like "Can I drive my car on water" could just be directed to the FAQ comments and answers "No, generally cars don't float unles you own a Schwimmvagen".<br/> <br/> I don't really mind answering that stuff but twice a week starts to get a little repetitious. Plus the posters seem to really want to hear that it works. No chance.<br/> <br/> <br/> Other than that we could provide some advice "How to pose a question : Make, model, year, engine, transmission type" would be a good start.<br/> <br/> ..and finally, how to say "Thanks for your help that worked / didn't work (delete one)"<br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119256</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119256</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 17:10:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <i>ok the last part could be left off.</i><br/> <br/> Like this?<br/> <br/> LOOKING FOR ANSWERS? YOU IDIOT!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121814</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1121814</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 12:26:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MrPhil]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Well that certainly is a problem isn't it?  Its probably time to just ask that a big letter flashing message gets posted at the top after login - something that says something like:<br/> <br/> LOOKING FOR ANSWERS?  YOU MIGHT GET THEM FASTER BY SEARCHING FOR EXISTING DISCUSSIONS - YOU IDIOT!<br/> <br/> ok the last part could be left off.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119011</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1119011</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 14:02:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ admitted amateur]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The big problem with this is that no one even uses the search function on this site. How can we expect them to click on a link to another site?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118829</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118829</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 13:49:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jsutter]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If the regulars do want to do this one can easily build their own Wiki (as in a Wikipedia).  Its a type of website that is easily set up and can be edited by anyone with "editor" privileges - though I'm pretty sure it can be left to open editing by anyone.  Editing can mean adding a new entry (e.g. Spark plugs, oil filters, water for fuel, gas mileage, etc.) and/or editing any existing entry.  Of course, the best Wikis will likely have a junk patrol since, as you know, bad info is all over.  That means it would be most useful if it was regularly patrolled and edited for bad info.<br/> <br/> If anyone is interested, the following site hosts free Wikis:<br/> <br/> <a href="http://www.wikidot.com/" target="_blank" >http://www.wikidot.com/</a><br/> <br/> though there are others that host these for free.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118827</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118827</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 13:44:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ admitted amateur]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ HELLOOOOOOOOOOO   ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118435</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118435</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 10:59:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cappy208]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[   The responders could cooperate in developing the FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions). This could be a useful, helpful, adjunct to the Search feature. Now, how do we get the attention, and cooperation, of the Website manager(s) to implement this?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118431</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118431</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 10:53:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ hellokit]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ ..and "What's the best oil filter to use"<br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118643</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118643</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 11:37:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ And the ever-popular "How often should I change oil/perform X maintenance procedure?"  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118421</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118421</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 10:36:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scrabbler]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ So what is better for your car . . . dino oil or synthetic?  Rocketman]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118418</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118418</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 10:26:09]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ rocketman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ after the last two months or so i an really wondering why the most inane irrelevant questions AND answers are getting both posted and every one riled up.<br/> <br/> maybe since we are in a recession more people are looking for the magical wrench, and are getting angry not finding it for free in this website!<br/> <br/> but then again, some of the 'help' from apparently the same person (masquerading under different screen names) is making it harder to get the OP to follow the posts with info and the ability to get help.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118415</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118415</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 10:20:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ cappy208]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ hehe....I don't think Saxo's are designed to be fixed, they're injection moulded at the Sevelnord plant. The Europeans don't know how to fix them, posting to this forum is the final stages of frustration.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118625</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118625</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 11:23:50]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br/> Excellent idea, Scudder.  And, your examples of frustratingly silly questions are also really good!   <br/> <br/> I would add to your list: "How do I repair the XXXXXX on my Citroen Saxo?"--a question that comes up every couple of months.  Hell--nobody in Europe seems to know how to repair them, so how someone in the US could answer that question is beyond me.  <br/> <br/> It might actually be a good idea to mention on the home page that this is a US-based forum, and perhaps a list of the European makes that are <u>not</u> sold in the US could be posted, thus leading to less frustration for those in Europe who are asking for help with cars that nobody is familiar with.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118233</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118233</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 09:55:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ VDCdriver]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Is it time for an FAQ page ?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I perceive a little frustration on the forum with a few (and they are very few) postings, though the subjects or concepts are frequent fliers. Does anyone think it’s time for an FAQ / How to phrase a question page ?<br/> <br/> A few candidates I can think of…..<br/> <br/> Can I run my car on water, composted grass cuttings or old unused acrylic paint ?<br/> <br/> What about the price of gas (take it to the global commerce forum).<br/> <br/> I know nothing about cars and don’t have a workshop manual for the Jaguar V12 I’ve just purchased, can anyone tell me how to completely rebuild my engine ?<br/> <br/> I have a blue car with a strange knocking sound, can you tell me what the problem is ?<br/> <br/> How do I phrase an intelligent sentence, use punctuation or use my caps lock key ?<br/> <br/> And of course the classic : Why are my followers falling off my Mercury ?<br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118221</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/1052610.page#1118221</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 09:14:05]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Scudder]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
