<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?"]]></title>
		<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/51002.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?"]]></description>
		<generator>Public Action</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Re: New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'd go for the Vibe.  Simplier drivetrain and made by Toyota quality.  There are a lot of posts on this site lately about Subaru Forester auto trans issues.  The more I read about Subarus the less likely I am to ever own one.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619810</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619810</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:38:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ UncleTurbo]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ My 2006 base Matrix 5-speed wears the inside edges of its Continental tires. The alignment is good, camber is modest, regular rotations etc. A couple days ago I thought of a stop-gap solution to do before the edges are too far gone.<br/>  <br/> I just went to a tire shop and had them remove the tires from the rims, flip 'em over, remount and balance. So now the worn edges are on the outside. Cost $109. The tire tech was skeptical, but hey, I'm paying...<br/>  <br/> I haven't had her up to highway speed yet but the handling feels OK and the tires are much quieter at 30mph. I got 16K miles out of one set of edges and if I can get another 16K I'll be satisfied. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619797</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619797</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:12:22]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ circuitsmith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I will chime in with this. I owned a 2004 Vibe and had so much trouble with tire wear that I finally traded it in a a new 2005 model. At about the 10K mark I had to replace both front tires. I drive normally and on straight roads for the most part. I traded the 2005 Vibe in on an extended cab Silverado. I spend more for gas but I spend a whole lot less on tires. Other Vibe owners have told me the same thing about tire wear.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619750</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619750</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:21:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ missileman]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I feel that as reliable as a Subaru is, Toyota products hold an edge given comparable maintenance. I'm a huge Corolla fan for kids....and this fits the bill as a clone. The only exception would be a definite need for AWD....you live in a place like I do. Our neighbors had no choice but to raise two boys with three Subarus parked in the yard. If that's not you..the Vibe has the potential for better service. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619451</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619451</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:23:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ dagosa]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ In addition to the test data presented by texases, you can see real crash data at IIHS.org.  In this case, it agrees with the fake crash test data.  The Forester Collision/Medical/Theft ratings are 78/75/18 and the Vibe ratings are 103/106/40.  Toyota Matrix ratings are 149/120/70.  Apparently, Matrix drivers get themselves into more trouble than Vibe drivers.  BTW, 100 is average in each category and lower is better.  Either one will probably never be in a serious accident.  It's all in what you are comfortable with.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619447</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619447</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:20:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If your area is normally subjected to harsh winter driving conditions, the Forester's AWD system is superior to that of most other AWD systems on the road, and would thus be a great advantage.  If you are not subject to severe winter driving conditions, I think that you would be better-off with the Vibe.<br/> <br/> Bear in mind that one blown or punctured tire on the Forester is likely to result in the purchase of 4 new tires, due to the AWD system.  A FWD Vibe will not have this restriction.<br/> <br/> The good news is that neither of these vehicles is what I would call a powerhouse, so your invincible 17 year old will likely get into less trouble with either of these vehicles than he would with something like a Trans Am.  (And, neither of these vehicles is likely to spend a significant amount of time "up on cinder blocks", unlike a Trans Am!)<br/> <br/> Also, I would suggest that you check whether the Vibe has a timing belt, or a timing chain.  The Forester will require a new timing belt at 105k or 8 years, whichever comes first.  If the Vibe (which is actually a Toyota Corolla station wagon with more fashionable styling) has a timing chain, that will save you money on one expensive maintenance procedure.<br/> <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619376</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619376</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:34:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ VDCdriver]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Plus for Vibe - cheaper, better mpgs, less to repair (no AWD, less concern with keeping tires the same)<br/> Plus for Forester - maybe a bit more room, better traction in bad conditions, and the crash ratings are better (see <a href="http://www.informedforlife.org/getscore.php" target="_blank" >http://www...tscore.php</a> )<br/> <br/> I got a Forester for our teen, so you know my vote.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619375</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619375</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:34:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ texases]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>New question: Which to buy 2003 Forester or 2003 fwd Vibe?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ We are looking to purchase an auto that our 17 year old son will be using.  We have found 2003 fwd Vibe and a Forester, both have 90k and the Vibe is $1,200. less; any thoughts out there?  We appreciate it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619370</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/2126447.page#2619370</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:24:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ rstanley]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
