<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Latest posts for the thread "Fuel Economy"]]></title>
		<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/12202.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest messages posted in the thread "Fuel Economy"]]></description>
		<generator>Public Action</generator>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Could he mean nitromethane???]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#967437</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#967437</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:19:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ irlandes]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm not sure I follow your post, BLE.  We use nitrogen for cooling and as a purge gas.  Oxygen is used for breathing and as an oxidizer.  We can't use argon; it costs too much.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963418</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963418</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:09:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "It is quite possible that both oxygen and nitrogen are actually by products of argon production, an inert gas used in MIG and TIG welding."<br/> <br/> It's not a matter of one or another gas being a by-product, the folks in the industrial gas business have processes to separate and sell all these gasses.  Each individual gas is sold at it's market value, based on supply and demand.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963239</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963239</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:49:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Craig58]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ That refrigeration cost would have to be borne anyway even if nobody needed the <i>by product</i> of oxygen production, nitrogen.  If nobody needed pure oxygen, then pure nitrogen would be the product and pure oxygen would be the by product, something to be thrown away if nobody needs it.  <br/> <br/> It is quite possible that both oxygen and nitrogen are actually by products of argon production, an inert gas used in MIG and TIG welding.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963219</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963219</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:15:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ B.L.E.]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "The cost of this stuff is basically the cost of compressing it into cylinders and transporting it."<br/> <br/> The refrigeration cost to separate the gases is a large part of the purchase price, too.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#962225</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#962225</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:39:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ There is nothing wrong with nitrogen, what is wrong is paying $30 for it.  The main advantage is that it is perfectly dry so there never is any condensation inside your tires to rust or corrode your rims.<br/> I can't, for the life of me, see how nitrogen could possibly decrease your tire's rolling resistance.<br/> Nitrogen is cheap, it basically is a by-product of refining air into pure oxygen.  If you didn't have a use for it, they would just have to release it back into the air anyway.  The cost of this stuff is basically the cost of compressing it into cylinders and transporting it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#962015</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#962015</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:17:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ B.L.E.]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Air is a mixture of gases, 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen with traces of water vapor, carbon dioxide, argon, and various other components. Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is N2O. This guy should have given her that so at least she'd have a giggle or two while forking over 30 bucks for an additional 20% of nitrogen fill which will do nothing ..... BOOOOOOGUSSSSSSS!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#961612</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#961612</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:09:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ razooli]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ - When buying compressed gas from a supplier, it's not necessarily "dry".  So, although it's likely to be drier than compressed air from a gas station, I wouldn't *assume* it to be so (unless I looked at the nitrogen tank and noticed that it was labeled "Bone Dry").  Besides, even if the air were saturated with moisture, I'm not sure it would make a difference to the longevity of the tire (most tires get replaced because they are punctured, wear out, etc., not because they 'dry rot' from the inside).<br/> - For all practical intents and purposes, as temperature increases all gases increase in pressure similarly.<br/> - A few months back Consumer Reports tested nitrogen in car tires and demonstrated that it leaked out slightly more slowly than air.  That said, what's the point?  Unless the tires were evacuated before filling with the nitrogen, there's plenty of oxygen in there already, and adding air to the tires will add more.  BTW, you should check your tires AT LEAST once each month and inflate (or deflate) them according to the standards listed on the sticker inside the driver's door jamb (NOT the pressure listed on the tire!!).    Even if your tires never lost any air (which is highly unlikely!), you'll need to vent some pressure for the summer, and add some for the winter.  That will end up adding plenty of air (i.e., gases other than nitrogen).<br/> - Your sister should ask for her money back, and the mechanic who rooked her should be publicly exposed as a scam artist.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963033</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963033</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:31:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ portiz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Being that Air (you know, the stuff we all breath in and out each and every day with each and every breath and normally fill our tires with) is apporximately 80% Nitrogen, 19% Oxygen and 1% trace gases like CO2, CO, Water Vapor, Argon, etc., I can hardly see how 100% Nitrogen is much better than 80%, epscially since most gases behave, at least thermodynamically in the old PV=nRT fashion, more or less the same (except for the water vapor which would be likely to condense and possibly even freeze to form ice at normal automotive operating temps But that is negligible).  So other than possible oxidation of the innner tire walls or the wheel, I can see no advantage to using pure nitrogen instead of air, for a nirmal car at least.  As some pointed out, there is a great advantage to suing it in Airplane Tires and possibly even racing car times, but clearl;y none for regualar old cars, even for better fuel economy.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960282</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960282</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:49:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ gregdavid]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ They have it (more or less) correct, see my previous post.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960248</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960248</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:21:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Craig58]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Apparently Tom and Ray get calls from time to time on this issue.  Here's one of their answers:<br/> <br/> <a href="http://www.cartalk.com/content/columns/Archive/2005/February/02.html" target="_blank" >http://www...ry/02.html</a><br/> <br/> The quick answer is that it isn't a problem unless you are a race car driver.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960245</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960245</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:18:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This is my first time on this site and I've read the, so far, 28 replies to this nitrogen question.<br/> The thing is, I'm pretty sure Tom and Ray dealt with this question, maybe a couple of months<br/> ago in their Car Talk newspaper column.  I don't recall exactly what they said, but am suprised<br/> no one has so far mentioned it.  (I think their bottom line was about what everyone seems to agree<br/> on, that the difference is negligible and the cost a gyp.)  As I have only disagreed with what they had to<br/> say twice in all the years I've read them, I tend to trust their "lousy" answers.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960244</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960244</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:12:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Peyton]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[      Perhaps if it were Helium, the vehicle would be a bit lighter, and that would translate into some mileage increase. Probably not enough. What if you filled the passenger, and trunk areas with helium? Compressed helium! Now were talking (albeit in a higher octave). Hmmm. must retire to the porcelain receptacle to further contemplate. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960240</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960240</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:56:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Eftimiades]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "I thought the whole point of nitrogen-filled tires was that the pure gas is DRY. Its chemical properties have little or no effect, but the lack of water can have a noticeable effect on minimizing pressure change due to temperature change. You should be able to get the same positive effect by using a very good dryer on your air compressor."<br/> <br/> I believe that is correct, both dry N2 and O2 will act about the same at these relatively low pressures and temperatures (close to an ideal gas), water/water vapor is the only real variable that is eliminated by using pure N2.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960247</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#960247</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:19:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Craig58]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I thought the whole point of nitrogen-filled tires was that the pure gas is DRY. Its chemical properties have little or no effect, but the lack of water can have a noticeable effect on minimizing pressure change due to temperature change. You should be able to get the same positive effect by using a very good dryer on your air compressor.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#956822</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#956822</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:29:27]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MrPhil]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[   Here is the brain twister. If nitrogen does not increase in pressure much as tire temperature increase, then nitrogen filed tires may decrease gas mileage. Here is why, if two sets of tires with equal pressure, one with nitrogen, and the other with air are both driven to operating temperature then the one with air would have a higher pressure, about one pound for every ten degrees rise in tire temperature, and therefor the tires with air will get the better gas mileage. The tire with nitrogen will always run close to cold tire inflation pressure. Don't know if tire, and car manufacture have different recommended inflation pressure using nitrogen. <br/> <br/> Both tire, and car manufactures set recommended tire inflation pressure based on cold tire pressure with the increase in pressure when the tire gets to operating pressure factored in. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#951034</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#951034</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:40:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ americar]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Oh leave her alone.   She thinks she's saving the planet like a former VP does.  That's worth it to her to minimize her damage to the earth while here.  So its a win win.  A hundred years from now no one will know she was here, and the guy at the tire shop got his $30.  Hee hee hee.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948011</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948011</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:06:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Bing]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Don't you need to quadruple (not double) the radius to know the size of the molecule?  Doubling it will tell you the distance between the two nuclei (i.e., the bond length), quadrupling it will tell you the size from the outer edge of one side to the outer edge of the other.  Regardless, the difference between O2 (73 pm * 4 = 292 pm) and N2 (75 pm * 4 = 300 pm), is less than 3%.  That said, a few months back Consumer Reports did demonstrate that tires filled with N2 held their pressure slightly better than those filled with air. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963048</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#963048</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:50:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ portiz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "Nitrogen molecules are larger than o2 molecules..."<br/> <br/> That is true, but just barely.  The difference is so small that I doubt there is a measurable difference in diffusion through the tire or past mating surfaces.  The covalent radius of nitrogen is 75 picometers; oxygen has a covalent radius of 73 picometers.  Just double both values to get the length of the diatomic molecule.  The difference is less than 3%.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948063</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948063</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:46:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Race tires are also much thinner, use a less dense compound, and (because they're thinner and softer...and the speeds those guys travel) are far more sensitive to changes in air temperature than passenger car tires. Race tires don't have to go 50,000 miles...or go over potholes. They can be thin and soft.<br/> <br/> Oh, and nitrogen won't feed a fire in the pits like oxygen would. That's why sanctioning bodies prohibit it.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#947830</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#947830</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:57:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ the same mountainbike]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nitrogen molecules are larger than o2 molecules so the tire will not dissipate (spelling?)the gas as quickly therefore, keeping the tires at the proper psi longer. BUT, the nitrogen will leak anyway and when you need to refill you must return to that dealer. Do you have time for that? I don't. Nascar uses nitrogen for good reasons but nobody on the street drives down rt 66 @ 178mph. Also o2 or air has been used ever since inflatable tires were invented so I believe they are good enough.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945267</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945267</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:15:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ meaneyedcatz]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Air at sea level is 21% oxygen, 78% nitrogen and 1% argon.  There's a very little bit of other stuff in there, too.<br/> <br/> I suppose that over time, oxygen might react with the rubber, but it should not be much.  I believe that anyone using a nitrogen charge, like aircraft or race cars, does it to reduce burn potential as mentioned above.  I see no particular reason for most people to use nitrogen only.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945259</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945259</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:02:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ jtsanders]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ For almost 40 years, I have been using a special blend of over 70% nitrogen, with about 20% oxygen, and several other gases, and I have been very happy with the results. It is available at many gas stations, and goes under the name of "AIR"!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945232</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945232</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:18:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Dleit53]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br/> And you asked about laughing gas. That's nitrous oxide, used by some dentists as a mild anesthetic. It is in no way related to the nitrogen used in those tires -- nor to the nitrogen in the atmosphere.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945222</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945222</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:42:17]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SteveF]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Tires filled with nitrogen will hold pressure longer than with just air.  As tire pressure decreases, mileage goes down as well.  If your sister isn't good about keeping an eye on her tire pressure, then her fuel economy could suffer a little and the nitrogen would help a little.  I'd guess that in a worse case situation, using the nitrogen might save her $5 over a 10 year period, if the "mechanic" gives her free refills as needed, including if she gets new tires.<br/> <br/> A couple of issues though, unlike aircraft tires which are purged of air when filling, most tire stores don't do this.  They just pressurize the tire with nitrogen, so there will still be some oxygen in there.  If you just use air to pressurize a tire and the oxygen slowly escapes, eventually the tires will have a high level of nitrogen, as air is 78% nitrogen.<br/> <br/> One good thing about using N2 is that it is dry, no moisture like you usually get from compressed air.  Some places use an air water separator on their air compressors, which helps.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945217</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945217</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:29:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ keith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br/> They burn well though.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#950046</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#950046</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:08:08]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MikeInNH]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Landfills the world over wish tires would deteriorate. They don't. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#947827</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#947827</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:52:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ the same mountainbike]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nitrogen is supposed to cut down on the deterioration due to oxygen inside the tire.  It may help some, but that is all it does.  A lot of tire companies use this, but the charge should be nominal.  It is perfectly safe.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945216</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945216</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:26:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ winarth]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ "Mechanic" is a misnomer in this case; ill informed or crook is more appropriate.<br/> Tell your sister to forget this "footprint" garbage also as that ranks right in there with the nitrogen business.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945018</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945018</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:25:24]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ ok4450]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Family discussions can get freaky. Overcharging for nitrogen would be $1.50 a tire. $30 for four tires is awful. There is a sucker born every minute. Save nothing, spend $30.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944856</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944856</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:31:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ pleasedodgevan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ 1. Wouldn't the tire companies be touting this? <br/> <br/>    They are, at least the questionable ones are.<br/> <br/> 2. My sister travels 2000 miles a year - how can she save $50.00? <br/> <br/>    Sure, over the next 50 years.  <br/> <br/> 3. Isn't nitrogen part of a formula for laughing gas? <br/> <br/>    That is nitrous oxide.  Different stuff.<br/> <br/> 4. Is the "Mechanic" blowing more than nitrogen?   <br/> <br/>    Yea, some oxygen, carbon dioxide and a few other gases.  Common air is about 80 Nitrogen.  $30.00 is higher than I have heard anyone ripping someone off on this one.  Many places do it for free with new tyres.  The real cost is a few cents per tyre and unless the pull a vacuum on the tyre to start with they may have brought that 80% to 85%.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944852</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944852</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:22:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Joseph_E_Meehan]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If the tires blow up from Nitrogen (not possible, but makes for good fodder on this site) she'd save lots of gas because the car WON'T BE DRIVING ANYWHERE!!!!!!!!!!!<br/> Will Nitrogen in my bicycle tires make it easier to pedal up hills?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#966812</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#966812</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:08:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MrFixIt]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>Norm--Could you kindly cite your source for "scientific" information of this nature? <br/> <br/> (I'll save you the trouble. There is no source for this information since you are very mistaken about the properties of nitrogen.) &nbsp;
		</blockquote><br/> <br/> Norms scientific knowledge (or lack there of) has been questioned a couple times here.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#950032</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#950032</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:16:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MikeInNH]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br/> <b>"Nitrogen! Holy Crap! Get that nitrogen out of there before she takes a long trip and blows herself to the moon. I guarantee this will happen when the weather gets warmer. Nitrogen is very unstable when mixed with warm air. And, never go back to that shop again. Your sister is going to someday leave a "Footprint" that is like a moon crater unless you get that Nitro out."</b><br/> <br/> Norm--Could you kindly cite your source for "scientific" information of this nature?<br/> <br/> (I'll save you the trouble.  There is no source for this information since you are very mistaken about the properties of nitrogen.)<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948044</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948044</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:56:57]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ VDCdriver]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Dangerous gases</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nitrogen won't cause anything to "blow up" (unless you put in too much pressure and blow the tire). <br/> <br/> Just be sure that you don't use acetylene, though (it's the squatty black tank on your welding truck). Avoid the oxygen, too!  If you see the guy roll out two tanks on a dolly, unhook his torch and hook up a filler nozzle, run away as fast as you can. She's about to blow, Scotty!! :D  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#959229</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#959229</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:29:33]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ egeezer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><br/> Nitrogen! Holy Crap! Get that nitrogen out of there before she takes a long trip and blows herself to the moon. I guarantee this will happen when the weather gets warmer. &nbsp;
		</blockquote><br/> <br/> Nitrogen is very safe...Far safer then Normal Air because it doesn't contain oxygen.<br/> <br/> However....it will NOT save you on gas mileage...It's a total waste of money. If they offered it for free (like many places do)..then fine..But to pay for it...no way no how.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948014</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#948014</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:10:34]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ MikeInNH]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I carry nitroglycerin with me everywhere I go. Doggoned heart attack!]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#947828</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#947828</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:54:21]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ the same mountainbike]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ To confirm what andrew j said, nitrogen is safe. You must be thinking of hydrogen. Or nitroglycerin.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945021</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945021</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:44:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ rockford]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Did you know air is 80% nitrogen? Many shops install nitrogen now(free) and its safe.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944865</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944865</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:53:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ andrew_j]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Nitrogen! Holy Crap! Get that nitrogen out of there before she takes a long trip and blows herself to the moon. I guarantee this will happen when the weather gets warmer. Nitrogen is very unstable when mixed with warm air. And, never go back to that shop again. Your sister is going to someday leave a "Footprint" that is like a moon crater unless you get that Nitro out.<br/> Anyone can improve their mileage by keeping the tires properly inflated. Ask yourself how many tanks of gas will it take, and what kind of driving will she have to do to achieve that $50. I bet it will be insignificant ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944849</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944849</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:20:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Beefy Norm]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It is also used in the struts, because it is a stable gas over a wide range of temps.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945245</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945245</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:57:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wizard]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[     "Nitrogen is used in large aircraft because of the change of atmospheric pressure and temperatures. It is a gas that under those conditions is more stable."<br/> <br/> Nitrogen is used in aircraft tires because it won't feed oxygen to a brake fire if the tire should explode from the flames and heat.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945214</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#945214</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:20:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ keith]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ No matter what gas is put in the tires, it will not really improve gas milage. My tires are filled with nitrogen only because when I bought them, that is what they filled them with for no "sdditional cost". Taking the lead out of the foot is a sure way to start saving and coasting as much as possible without having to stop is another. Of course, one must stop at the stop signs, but coasting to ths traffic light trying not to bring the car to a complete stop is another way.<br/> <br/> The mechanic is probably laughing about what all the way to the bank.<br/> <br/> Nitrogen is used in large aircraft because of the change of atmospheric pressure and temperatures. It is a gas that under those conditions is more stable.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944846</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944846</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:15:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ wizard]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Re: Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br/> If that mechanic had an M.D. degree, he would be called a "quack".  Since he apparently lacks that sheepskin, the most polite term that I can come up with for him is <b>Scam Artist</b>.  Once your sister realizes that she has blown $50.00, perhaps she will become more wary of obvious scams like this.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944843</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944843</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:09:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ VDCdriver]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Fuel Economy</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ My sister who lives in the city of cars, Detroit, has just informed me that she has found a way to greatly increase her auto milage and thus make her foot print smaller.  Her "mechanic"  has pumped nitrogen into the 4 tires of her 2007 Buick.  This cost her $30.  BUT, he guarantees that she will save her $50.00 due to the increased MPG.  I doubt this.<br/> 1.  Wouldn't the tire companies be touting this?<br/> 2.  My sister travels 2000 miles a year - how can she save $50.00?<br/> 3.  Isn't nitrogen part of a formula for laughing gas?<br/> 4.  Is the "Mechanic"  blowing more than nitrogen? ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944841</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/865814.page#944841</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:03:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ usedcars]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
