In her new book, The World Has Curves, Julia Savacool travels around the world in search of the "ideal" female body. Although the "ideal" body is different from culture to culture, Savacool claims, there is one similarity across them all: economics. As she sees it, what the "ideal" female form looks like and the reasons women pursue it has a whole lot to do with marketing, trends, and social status.
What do you think? Have you experienced differences in the ideal of female beauty when moving between cultures? How do you think these ideals get defined? Why do women try to attain such ideals and what happens when they don't? Share your thoughts here and we might just use them on the air when Julia Savacool joins us, Thursday, September 17th at 3:00pm.
The official ideal female body is defined by periodical publications for teen-age girls such as Cosmopolitan and whatever periodical teen-age boys are whacking off to these days.
The official ideal female body is defined by television and movies.
The official ideal female body is defined by Wisconsin Public Radio discussions of books and other media from the giant media companies that own the magazines and movies and television that provide the official definition of both male and female body ideals.....
This is an absolutely spot-on article. Jean should do a show with the person who wrote it. It answers very well the question posed above: "Why do women try to attain such ideals and what happens when they don't?", but it is about more than just body image.
In spite of the article's frightful and depressing name, it is an honest assessment, with a large dose of upbeat answers and strategies for dealing with what women have been given in this American life.
AMERICA, ---A NATION OF SAD, SUICIDAL, DEPRESSED, FITFUL, LONELY DESPONDENT WOMEN
A beautiful forty year old New Yorker confessed to me that she wants to kill herself and was saving sleeping pills to do the job. She came to the city a decade ago to make it big in her work, did very well for ten years, but then the recession hit. She is deeply in debt, has no one, is alienated from a dysfunctional family that made her heart sore a decade ago, so there's no going back to them. She lives in a little one room apartment in a borough of the big, anonymous city. To her mind, Death is better than facing the four walls of her cul-de-sac one day longer. I can see her point of view. What's left for her? She came to the big city to make it, a skewed strategy at the gitgo but the only one that girls today have left to them. They cannot stay in the dysfunctional family mire into which they were born. They left home with their little suitcase years ago after spending their teens watching a counterfeit media full of rock star myths, movie star chic and addictive celeb worship that dyed the skeins of their mind this ROSY PINK. Believing in PINK MYTHS, they chose to aim at the Capitalist Dream of "Girls Making it Big."
WHY LEAVE HOME IN THE FIRST PLACE? FAME AND POWER AND MONEY in SHOW BIZ is an illusory, ill thought out "planned revenge or satisfaction" but one which RUNS in modern girls' veins.. (The Horatio Alger myth is the predominant, American guiding philosophy and has been for over a century. ALGERISM is about being an honorable, diligent man and making it big and entering the next class up in flaming colors. One doesn't need to have read Alger's writings to have this myth in one's bloodstream guiding one's life. It's the zeitgeist of Capitalist novels, tv, magazines, all the programming we are fed on shares this Cinderella mythology. As soon as FEMALES were allowed into a marketplace which promised upward mobility, the myth of fame and power began to infect us. So when THE BIG PINATA doesn't appear promptly, disenchantment follows. And then identity shock. Oh my, what am I? A LOSER?
When the average girl slams up against the STIGMA of being a loser, she will be BEREFT. But that's what happens in the big city. Soon she is caught in a cross wind of a plummeting job market, rising rents, skyrocketing credit card debt (trickily based on incremental interest rates gathering like storm clouds on the unpaid principle, fear of not having a credit rating as debtors today learn that one can LIVE off the card. The credit card has become father and mother to our orphaned kids today and it's a false protection at best. When they slam up against "no more clients" for what they do, no jobs if they wanted to cross over into the job market, they keenly feel how orphaned they are, stuck in the costly rented room that turns into a horrid jail cell and hara-kiri may seem a good solution.
From the girl's point of view, forty, unmarried, no celebrity job? She has nothing; she is nothing....
This article is excellent. It is awesome. It shows the recognition of facts instead of just "exploring feelings" and all that touchy-feely stuff that is so often passed off as a serious discussion of women's topics.
This article is facts AND feelings. This article has the beginnings of change in it, and I'm not talking the fake Obama-style change.
Cervical Vaccine Developer Says Vaccine May Be Deadlier Than Cancer
THE cervical cancer vaccine may be riskier and more deadly than the cancer it is designed to prevent, a leading expert who developed the drug has warned.
She also claimed the jab would do nothing to reduce the rates of cervical cancer in the UK.
Speaking exclusively to the Sunday Express, Dr Diane Harper, who was involved in the clinical trials of the controversial drug Cervarix, said the jab was being “over-marketed” and parents should be properly warned about the potential side effects.
Authorities in the UK should be on the alert because its sister vaccine, Gardasil, used in America, has already been associated with 32 deaths, she said.
Her comments follow the death of 14-year-old Natalie Morton, who collapsed an hour after receiving the jab at school last week.
It is highly unusual for a researcher to publicly criticise a vaccine which they helped get approved.
However, Dr Harper, who has written many of the published medical papers about the jab, is so concerned she decided to speak out.
Dr Harper, of the University of Missouri-Kansas, said she believed the risks – “small but real” – could be worse than the risk of developing cancer itself.
And she claimed: “All this jab will do is prevent girls getting some abnormalities associated with cervical cancer which can be treated. It will not decrease cervical cancer rates at all."