<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[wosu discussions]]></title>
		<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosuforums/list.page</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest discussed for "wosu"]]></description>
		<generator>Public Action</generator>
			<item>
				<title>OK Liberals, How will the Democratic Plan Lower Oil Prices?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ According to the Dispatch, this is the Democratic Energy Policy. To me this is pure insanity (except the OPEC idea), but I would like someone to explain to me how any of these policies will help our current crisis?<br/> Democrat asks public to push for oil-policy changes<br/> <br/> First they misdiagnose the Problem:<br/> price of oil, fostered by President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney's close ties to <br/> the oil industry, is no longer just a burden.<br/> <br/> Democratic Solution:<br/> <br/> She promoted the Democratic proposals for changing energy policy. Those call for:<br/> <br/> • Ending billions of dollars in tax breaks for big oil <br/> <br/> companies.<br/> <br/> • Forcing the oil companies to invest some of their profits in clean and affordable alternative energy.<br/> <br/> • Protecting the American people from price gougers and greedy oil traders <br/> <br/> who manipulate the market.<br/> <br/> • Temporarily stopping <br/> <br/> the diversion of oil to the national Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which is 97 percent full.<br/> <br/> • Standing up to the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other oil-producing nations that are working together to keep oil prices high.<br/> <br/> <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/national_world/stories/2008/05/11/Dems_energy_0511.ART_ART_05-11-08_A8_8BA5T3G.html?sid=101" target="_blank" >http://www...ml?sid=101</a><br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1056409.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1056409.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 11 May 2008 12:24:32]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Feedback about the Website; Help Improve the Site</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Post your ideas to improve the WOSU Discussion Board.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1054209.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1054209.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 May 2008 16:01:18]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Should Pay Day Lenders Be Regulated - Banned?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ State lawmakers are considering a bill that could put payday lenders out of business in Ohio.  The bill would cap interest rates at 28% and limit borrowers to 4 loans per year.   Currently payday lenders charge yearly interest rates that can reach 390%.   ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1049810.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1049810.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 9 May 2008 16:19:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mike Thompson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Censorship by TV networks regarding Pentagon's Illegal Propaganda Program</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ FDR 5/26/1940 Fireside Chat:<br/> <br/> "Also, our present emergency and a common sense of decency make it imperative that no new group of war millionaires shall come into being in this nation as a result of the struggles abroad. The American people will not relish the idea of any American citizen growing rich and fat in an emergency of blood and slaughter and human suffering."<br/> <br/> Fastfoward to 2008 and the Military-Industrial-Media Complex: <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/05/pentagon_propaganda.html" target="_blank" >http://www...ganda.html</a><br/> <br/> Think Again: Pentagon Propaganda and the Media Stonewall<br/> By Eric Alterman, George Zornick | May 1, 2008 <br/> <br/> PRINT <br/> EMAIL <br/> TEXT: A A A <br/> SHARE <br/> del.icio.us<br/>  <br/> Digg<br/>  <br/> Facebook<br/>  <br/> Google<br/>  <br/> reddit<br/>  <br/> stumbleupon<br/>  <br/> On April 18, 2006, retired U.S. Air Force Major General Donald Shepperd appeared on CNN’s “Situation Room” with Wolf Blitzer to respond to the news that a wave of retired generals was calling for the resignation of then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in response to his mishandling of virtually every aspect of the war effort in Iraq.<br/> <br/> Rumsfeld had called a meeting with many current and former military officials days earlier, and Shepperd was one of them. When Blitzer asked Shepperd if Rumsfeld brought up the controversy, Shepperd downplayed its importance. “Very little, Wolf. Everybody expected the headlines out of this to be the secretary says the following things. And the focus of the meeting was very little on that. … Basically, the focus was on how the war in Iraq is going, how it would have been different in the past if, and that type of thing. It was not about the retired generals controversy, although the secretary is clearly distracted by it and worried about it and concerned about it, and he listened to a lot of things from the group.”<br/> <br/> On the same program, CNN Pentagon Correspondent Jamie McIntyre simply (and uncritically) repeated Shepperd’s assertion, explaining, “Well, Wolf, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld is not taking much of this criticism to heart, and he’s making it clear he’s not [going] any place, anywhere—any time soon.”<br/> <br/> What viewers could not know at the time was that Rumsfeld called the meeting in question specifically for the purpose of combating calls for his resignation. Mr. Rumsfeld’s staff insisted that “the boss” wanted the meeting fast “for impact on the current story.” When the New York Times leaked word of the planned meeting, the Pentagon scrambled to play it off as simply a matter of routine.<br/> <br/> Viewers also didn’t know that it wasn’t the first time retired military officers, who often appeared as objective analysts in the media, met with Rumsfeld to construct carefully honed messages. To the contrary—as reported by the New York Times in a stunning, 7,500 word story last week “the analysts met personally with Mr. Rumsfeld at least 18 times, records show, but that was just the beginning. They had dozens more sessions with the most senior members of his brain trust and access to officials responsible for managing the billions being spent in Iraq.”<br/> <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1045210.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1045210.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 8 May 2008 14:16:55]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Newt Gingrich: Steer clear!!! Repubs headed directly at huge iceberg</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ From Newt's most recent article at Human Events: <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26376" target="_blank" >http://www...p?id=26376</a><br/> <br/> The Anti-Obama, Anti-Wright, and Anti-Clinton GOP Model Has Been Tested -- And It Failed<br/> The Republican brand has been so badly damaged that if Republicans try to run an anti-Obama, anti- Reverend Wright, or (if Senator Clinton wins), anti-Clinton campaign, they are simply going to fail. <br/> <br/> This model has already been tested with disastrous results.<br/> <br/> In 2006, there were six incumbent Republican Senators who had plenty of money, the advantage of incumbency, and traditionally successful consultants.<br/> <br/> But the voters in all six states had adopted a simple position: "Not you." No matter what the GOP Senators attacked their opponents with, the voters shrugged off the attacks and returned to, "Not you."<br/> <br/> The danger for House and Senate Republicans in 2008 is that the voters will say, "Not the Republicans."<br/> <br/> Anti-Obama, anti-Pelosi, anti-Obama's ex-preacher ads did not work in Special Congressional elections in Illinois and Louisiana.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1045209.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1045209.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 8 May 2008 14:05:11]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>McSame: eBay is the answer to poverty and recession.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Out of touch McSame: <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/05/07/john-mccains-top-10-out-of-touch-moments/#more-29032" target="_blank" >http://www...more-29032</a><br/> <br/> 3. eBay is the answer for poverty and recession. During his so-called “Forgotten Places” tour last month, John McCain offered the people of the economically devastated regions in Martin County, Kentucky and Youngstown, Ohio a path out of financial desperation: eBay. “Today, for example,” McCain said, “1.3 million people in the world make a living off eBay, most of those are in the United State of America.” If that sounds like something McCain’s national campaign co-chair and former eBay CEO Meg Whitman might say, it’s because she did. In March, she told Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes, “We have about - around the world, about 1.3 million people make most, if not all, of their living selling on eBay.” (It should come as no surprise that President Bush, too, extolled the virtues of Americans’ economic futures as sellers on eBay.)<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1043809.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1043809.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 8 May 2008 00:56:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Take a look at Iceland, Nay-sayers</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Iceland was the poorest country in Europe in 1970. It imported coal to supply it's energy needs.<br/> <br/> Today, it is one of the most prosperous countries in Europe. Iceland is energy self-reliant and even exports energy. Iceland invested tapping into its renewable resources and it is paying off handsomely. Manufacturers are lining up to open factories there. <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16836510" target="_blank" >http://www...d=16836510</a><br/> <br/> The U.S. has more the potential for even more renewable energy sources than Iceland, in relative terms. Yes, it would take several trillion dollars in ivestment to hook up the grid for solar and wind but it would be money well spent and put millions of people to work.<br/> <br/> One third of the houses in gloomy Germany have solar panels because banks are required to give low interest loans to homeowners for the installation and then residents pay off the loans by selling power back to the grid. It costs homeowners virtually nothing.<br/> <br/> The technology exists for America to become energy self-reliant again. This would equate to true freedom. Even John McSame said that the Iraq War was started for oil. <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1043613.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1043613.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 7 May 2008 23:35:39]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>McSame implies Iraq War for oil</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Apparently, we were lied to to go to war which is the worst crime possible. Here's a quote from John McSame from a few days ago:<br/> <br/> "My friends, I will have an energy policy that we will be talking about, which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East that will - that will then prevent us - that will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East."<br/> <br/> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/02/mccain-implies-iraq-war-i_n_99866.html" target="_blank" >http://www...99866.html</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1037210.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1037210.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 12:41:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Hypocrite McSame launches his Spanish language website</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/espanol/" target="_blank" >http://www.johnmccain.com/espanol/</a><br/> <br/> This comes two years after McSame voted to make the English the official national language of the U.S.<br/> <br/> This guy will do anything to pander for votes---vote against an immigration bill that had his name on it, vote for the CIA to continue torture tactics a few months ago even though he says he so against the use of torture, etc, etc.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1037209.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1037209.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 6 May 2008 12:21:53]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Do you desire a downtown streetcar line</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Mayor Coleman wants to spend 103 million dollars to build a downtown Columbus streetcar line.  He says it will boost business and spark an expansion of mass transit.  Critics say it's too much money.  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1024213.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1024213.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 13:00:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mike Thompson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Do you support a Casino in SW Ohio?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Developers want to build a casino in Southwest Ohio. Voters may be asked to approve it this fall.  What do you think?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1024210.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1024210.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 12:59:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mike Thompson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Should Marc Dann Resign?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann refuses to resign after taking responsibility for not stopping sexual harassment in his office and after admitting to having an affair with a staffer. Three of his top aides were forced out. His female scheduler who was often seen at his former apartment  has quit.   Should Marc Dann quit. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1024209.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1024209.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 12:58:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mike Thompson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Let's end the Republican "free lunch" policies</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The case for progressive taxation is simple:<br/> <br/> The rich use more government services to acquire and maintain their wealth. Government services being an educated workforce, courts to enforce contracts, water, air, roads, etc.<br/> <br/> Progressive taxation is about the wealthy paying their fair share as Teddy Roosevelt spoke out about. Bill Gates realizes that his fortune was made possible by taxpayer funded government research that developed the internets.<br/> <br/> I say let's not only roll back the Bush tax cuts but we should also roll back the Reagan tax cuts too. <br/> <br/> Remember that the Republicans said the Clinton tax hikes on the rich would cause a Great Depression. Instead, the economy went gangbusters and the budget got balanced.<br/> <br/> We don't have to reinvent the wheel here---a vigorous progressive tax schedule worked out pretty good in the Eisenhower years with a huge middle class and rising wages.<br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1023612.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1023612.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 2 May 2008 11:42:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Replacing current topical shows with a special.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Why have you dropped two of your best current topic talk shows with a miniseries - specifically Tavis Smiley and Charlie Rose with "Carrier"? I find carrier to be an interesting show but why run it repeatedly without any breaks and eliminate 2 of your best programs.  We;re missing out on some of the best discussions because of this overlay.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1019009.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1019009.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 1 May 2008 00:01:54]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ SOLVEIGA]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Corporate media up to dirty tricks.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Obama has cut ties with his ex-pastor. This story should be a dead issue.<br/> <br/> The corporate media selectively plays the guilt by association game. Where was the furor by the fact that George H.W. Bush was having breakfast with Osama Bin Laden's brother the morning of 9-11? Then the White House approved Bin Laden family members in America to be flown out of the USA the day after 9-11 without even debriefing them???]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1016609.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1016609.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:11:28]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>No US Recession: Economy Grew in the 1st Quarter. Liberals wrong AGAIN!!!</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ How many time can these liberals and the media be wrong?!!! All this sky is falling nonsense from the liberals and this mortgage "crisis" hasn't even cause a single dow quarter. The President Bush economy is increadibly strong, and has even been able gto weather what liberals can called a catastrophie. It also proves beyond a resonable doubt that WOSU Open-Line needs to get new programmers, because nothing I have heard on that show is anything but sky is falling nonsense from these Ivory Tower EXPERTS that write books about what other people do in the the real world. Their predicting abilities are about as good as these global warming nit wits.<br/> <br/> Economy grows by only 0.6 percent in 1st quarter of 2008<br/> Wednesday April 30, 9:01 am ET <br/> By Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer  <br/> Economy limps ahead at a 0.6 percent pace in first quarter, better pace than expected <br/> <br/> <br/> WASHINGTON (AP) -- The bruised economy limped through the first quarter of this year at only a 0.6 percent growth rate as housing and credit problems forced people and businesses alike to hunker down.<br/> <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080430/economy.html" target="_blank" >http://biz...onomy.html</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1015609.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1015609.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:22:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>White House missing millions of emails, local media dogs Marc Dann's emails</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Early in the run-up to the Iraq War the White House switched email systems. The White House did not get a new archive system since the switch which is a shocking negligence of best practices in the IT world. <br/> <br/> All the back-ups have been destroyed as well as the hard drives and all the computers went missing with no tracking whatsoever. <br/> <br/> Several courts have ruled that documents created by the people belong to the American people since the advent of email technology. The Presidential Records Act considers emails as official records.<br/> <br/> Republican Dan Burton held several hearings because emails written by staffers with the last name beginning with the letter 'D' of then Presidnent Bill Clinton went missing. Burton spent $11 million of taxpayer money and the investigation found that it was because of a glitch.<br/> <br/> Possibly most troubling is that the White House switched to an email system in 2002 that sends emails to a server in Chattnooga TN which is 1200 miles from DC OVER OPEN AND UNSECURE LINES OF THE INTERNET. Tens of millions of White House emails were sent wildly unsecure.<br/> <br/> Yet, the conservative media such as the Dispatch, NPR and the TV news shows execpt Olbermann barely mention the story. Here in Columbus we have heard much about Marc Dann's stupid email behavior but nothing about the White House breaking the laws of the Presidential Records Act and risking national security and Karl Rove ignoring Congressional subpoenas.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1015009.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1015009.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:57:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The primary reasons for today's world-wide food shortages </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ 1. Human activity is overwhelming the earth's resources. <br/> <br/> 2. Deregulation of the commodity markets by President Clinton and the Republican Congress in 2000. Many industries were deregulated since Reagan and we are now paying a heavy price.<br/> <br/> 3. Price of oil is going through the roof which is causing food prices to increase (fertilizer, fuel for farm equipment, transportation costs).<br/> <br/> 4. Global warming. Many areas of the world are turning into deserts. Drought, flooding and extreme weather ruining crop yields.<br/> <br/> 5. Sideshow Bob's favorite, corn ethanol which is a very inefficient biofuel. Both the Republicans and Dems are equally at fault for pandering to the Corn Lobby on the corn ethanol issue. <br/> <br/> Sugar-cane is many times better as a biofuel. We should make hemp legal to grow as it is a very efficient biofuel. There are other good biofuels too---switchgrass, etc.<br/> <br/>  ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1012009.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1012009.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:11:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why hasn't the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade???</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Most of the Supremes lied during their nomination hearings and said they believe in stare decisis (respecting precedents). But it's clear that a majority of the court believes that Roe should be overturned---Scalia, Alito, Roberts, Thomas and Kennedy. Seven of the nine Supremes were appointed by Repub presidents. <br/> <br/> I think conservative justices  are holding back on Roe for political reasons. They don't want the issue to become a wedge issue for Dems. How incredibly lame!<br/> <br/> That said, I believe Roe was a bad decision. I think the issue should be left for states to decide. The Supreme Court ruled on Roe before the politics of the right to choose had formed. <br/> <br/> Making the right to choose illegal will completely change how the issue is covered by the media. Cable news shows will cover stories about women dying horrible deaths. Countries that have made abortions illegal have found it necessary to have government vagina inspectors in hospitals. Few people will support that reality.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1010612.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1010612.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:35:49]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Neocons scape-goating Iran </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ War mongerers often point out that Iraqi militias (and possibly the Iraqi Army and police) are using "Iranian made" munitions against U.S. troops. What the media does not ask is whether the alleged Iranian-made munitions are coming directly from the Iranian government OR from private arms dealers from within Iran.<br/> <br/> American-made arms are used in several conflicts throughout the world, many of which are distributed by private arms dealers. Is the USA to blame when munitions made here are used in violent conflicts throughout the world???]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1010610.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1010610.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:07:35]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What the corporate media is not saying about Rev. Jerimiah Wright</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Trinity had less than 100 members when Rev. Wright took over. It now has several thousand members. He has overseen many programs started by the church to empower church members and those in the community---education programs, job training, after school, day care, etc. He's advocated his community to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. <br/> <br/> IMO, the mainstream media is doing a crapy job giving context to the story. Rev. Wright preaches from the Liberation or Social Gospel theology. He has never advocated violence. IMO, his sermons are consistent with the preaching of MLK, Jr. who we have a national holiday for.<br/> <br/> Rev. Wright was a decorated U.S. Marine during the Vietnam era. He disagreed with the war but treated soldiers. He must have been very accomplished as he graduated at the top of his class in Medic training with the military and was even part of the medical team that operated on President LBJ.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1010609.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1010609.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:57:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Sen Thad Cochran(R): " The thought of McCain being president sends a cold chill down my spine."</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <br/> Senator Thad Cochran gave these worries wide attention back in January when he remarked, "The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me." <br/> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/12/max-boot-mccain-will-sca_n_86252.html" target="_blank" >http://www...86252.html</a><br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1008810.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1008810.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:39:31]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>My take home from watching "The Eleventh Hour"</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ All ecosystems on the earth are in decline. Burning fossil fuels and human overpopulation are our biggest problems. Carbon-based energy supplies have made possible the explosion in population the last two hundred years or so.<br/> <br/> The story we're told about the human race is that our population was relatively stable for over a hundred thousand years, then slowly grew to around a quarter-billion about the time of Christ. Finally, in 1800, we hit our first one billion humans.<br/> <br/> From there, our population exploded like cockroaches in a dirty New York apartment. Two billion by 1930. Three billion in 1960. Four billion in 1974. Five billion in 1987. Six billion around 2000.<br/> <br/> The solution to the  problems are two-fold: cultural (changing human thinking and behavior) and technological. Empowering women is the answer to achieving a negative birth rate. Affluent women from rich oil producing countries  ten to have many children. But women in societies that have a level playing field of rights as men have always produced negative birth rates.<br/> <br/> The other solution is to covert from relying on CONG (coal, oil, nukes and natural gas) and instead rely on renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, tidal, geothermal.<br/> <br/> Stopping the use of energy from the sun that was produced millions of years ago we can get the earth's ecosystems back in balance. The technology exists TODAY to reduce the carbon footprint of humans by 90%. It's critical we make that happen now.<br/> <br/> I highly recommend "The Eleventh Hour." It takes off where Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" left off. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1008809.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1008809.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:29:29]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>OFEC: Organization of Food Exporting Countires</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This is a market friendly way to solve the energy crisis. To balance the cartel of oil exporting countries, the US should form a cartel of food exporting countries that feed the middle east. I bet we can hold-out without gas longer than they can without food. <br/> <br/> I'm no expert, but I don't think you can grow corn in the desert, and we can drill in ANWR. America simply has been too kind to the Middle East. It is time to fight fire with fire.<br/> <br/> <img src="http://www.thardesertsafari.com/images/camel.jpg" >]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1007809.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1007809.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:04:10]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Republican agenda to destroy the civil service and responsive govt.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Here's a story you don't hear on NPR or the corporate media <a href="http://www.liberaloasis.com/archives/011605.htm#011805" target="_blank" >http://www...htm#011805</a><br/> <br/> The Bushies don’t want a government workforce of experienced professionals who inform the public with reliable, objective factual data.<br/> <br/> They want a government of political hacks who will put out the (mis)information the president wants.<br/> <br/> The Heritage Foundation laid out the conservative vision of the federal workforce when Dubya first came to town, in the report “Taking Charge of Federal Personnel.”<br/> <br/> That report sniffed at the “Public Administration Model” of government as “emphasiz[ing] the Progressive ideal--a value-free ‘scientific’ program of government administration.”<br/> <br/> Instead, it preferred the “Political Administration Model” which it defines as “providing presidential leadership to committed top political officials…holding them and their subordinates personally accountable for achievement of the President's election-endorsed and value-defined program.”<br/> <br/> That may sound nice enough on paper, but we’ve seen what that means in action.<br/> <br/> It means pressuring the intelligence community to provide assessments that fit with predetermined Administration objectives.<br/> <br/> It means threatening to fire staff that dare try to give Congress accurate cost estimates of Medicare proposals.<br/> <br/> It means creating a Homeland Security agency, without civil service protections, that is prone to politicized terror alerts.<br/> <br/> It means installing cronies at the head of Cabinet agencies, turning the Cabinet into a Politburo.<br/> <br/> In sum, it means a government that is no longer yours, no longer one that serves the broad public, but one that serves a single politician.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1005610.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1005610.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:41:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Nuclear industry huge welfare recipient</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The Price-Anderson Nuclear Indemnity Act allows nuke power plants to operate w/o insurance. You guessed it, taxpayers are on the hook for nuclear accidents. Nuke power plants would be a non-starter w/o this Act because no insurance company would insure nuke plants because the risks are huge.<br/> <br/> This is crazy. It's like taxpayers allowing drunk drivers to go w/o insurance and sticking liability on taxpayers.<br/> <br/> Solar, wind and other renewable energy sources are the way to go. Nuke plants are dangerous and produce millions of pounds of radioactive waste.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1005216.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1005216.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:05:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>NPR bias from the liberal perspective</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ NPR does little investigative reporting anymore. Ten years ago they exposed fraud and corruption of Archer, Daniels, Midland (ADM). The cons hollered and threatened to cut back or eliminate funding for NPR. ADM began underwriting a ton of programming. And in my opinion NPR's investigative reporting has been severely stunted since.<br/> <br/> I hear almost as much corporate ads on NPR as on commerical radio. I think most NPR reporters want to give fair and balanced reports but the politics of the time hold them back. <br/> <br/> NPR is now run by political zeolots of the neocons.<br/> <br/> NPR did not do enough to expose the rush to war with Iraq. These days I think NPR stands for National Pentagon Radio or National Petroleum Radio. There are some good shows and good solid reporters on NPR but also alot of propaganda and the neocon perspective is given way too much deference.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1005213.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1005213.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:08:41]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Bio-Fuels Holocaust; Environmentalism PC Final Solution</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Attend any environmental or Global Warming meeting and the topic of "population control" and "Malthusianism" is sure to emerge. This thread is to highlight the net result of environmentalism's effort to save the planet, and kill mankind in the process. The easiest, most effective and politically acceptable way is to simply starve people to death in the name of saving the planet. That is why they are more concerned with the highly speculative man made global warming than the certainty of people starving around the world.<br/> <br/> <img src="http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/media/wosu/pa/images/uploads/2008/4/26/64bbc1c05f677b6f935de619bc05e083_239006.jpg" >]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1004010.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1004010.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:16:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>HBO/David McCullough's "John Adams" has conservative bias</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ McCullough is a Bushie. In his "John Adams" book he downplays two power-grab scandals of the Adams presidency---the "xyz affair" and the alien-sedition acts.<br/> <br/> Adams tried to gin up a war with the French in the xyz affair. A classic example of a conservative using fear and war to gain political power.<br/> <br/> Adams put journalists and rival politicians/citizens in prison for expressing their opinions using the alien and sedition acts. Typical conservative tyranical behavior very similar to Bush. <br/> <br/> McCullough portrays Jefferson as a buffoon in his book. I'm steering clear of the John Adams mini-series on HBO. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1003411.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1003411.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:39:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Huge corporations have exported slavery &amp; pollution to China</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ China has a despotic government and no longer has Communist economic system. There are 700 factories in China and zero in the U.S.A. that make goods for Wal-Mart. China sells us goods but does not trade with the U.S. because they buy very few American made goods. American workers have suffered from the loss of millions of good jobs.<br/> <br/> China has a prison economy. Many factories are right next to prisons. Workers who speak out soon end up inside the prisons or worse. Essentially all workers are prisoners.<br/> <br/> Huge corporations such as Wal-Mart and General Electric are in bed with the despots who run China. People who have a social conscience should try to change what is happening in China by putting pressure on such huge corporations such as Wal-Mart.<br/> <br/> The Chinese have occupied Tibet for over 50 years. Most Tibetans suffer from extreme poverty. The situation in Tibet is very similar to what South African apartheid was like. Tibetans are twelve-class citizens and are given no opportunities. Tourists are taken to Tibetan markets but the merchants are really Chinese people in Tibetan costume. Tibet is rich in resources such as uranium and timber. The Tibetans don't necessarily want independence. They just want to be treated humanely.<br/> <br/> I don't think we should boycott the Olympics but the people who have protested the torch are doing God's work.<br/> <br/> Thomas Jefferson and slave masters long ago had to look their slaves in the eye. Today almost all our goods are made by what is essentially slave labor on the other side of the world. ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1000809.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/1000809.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:33:36]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Reagan, not Congress, did away with the Fairness Doctrine in 1987. There were essentially 3 parts to the Fairness Doctrine.<br/> <br/> 1. Free time on the public airwaves was given to serious political candidates. This is a no-brainer.<br/> <br/> 2. Broadcast stations had to show that they were using the public airwaves with public interest in mind. There was a firewall between news divisions and advertising. Newscasters reported real news. News was not expected to be a profit center. Journalists weren't million dollar stars. Today, corrupt politicians deny journalists access if they are asked tough questions and the broadcast journalists risk losing their million dollar salaries. No-brainer here too. <br/> <br/> 3. Equal time given to issues. This part of the Fairness Doctrine is the most controversial. Columbus has 6 conservative radio stations and one liberal even though almost 65% vote Democratic. Conservative tycoons own and control broadcasting companies. If they don't change their ways and offer programming that's more fair and balanced then this part of the Doctrine  should be reinstated too.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/998210.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/998210.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:33:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Digital to Analog Converter Issues </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Are you getting free over-the-air TV and dealing with getting a converter? If so, what has been the experience?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/993419.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/993419.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:49:19]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Tom Rieland]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The John Wayne myth</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ John Wayne was a chickenhawk just like Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Gingerich, Kristol, and most of the other Neocons who want to send other people to war but wanted someone else to fight in their place when it was their turn.<br/> <br/> John Wayne went to great measures to avoid fighting in WWII. This was at a time that most celebrities served-Clark Gable, Tyrone Power, Ted Williams, etc.<br/> <br/> In the decades that followed, John Wayne was a cheerleader for war against China, the Soviets, Vietnam, Korea, etc.<br/> <br/> The American public is beginning to see that first-strike wars and corporate imperialism has disasterous consequences. The John Wayne chickenhawks are dangerous and should not be trusted. <br/> <br/> John Wayne was only a tough guy in the movies.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/992409.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/992409.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:03:38]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>How high will oil prices go?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Our cowboys-in-chief, Bush and Cheney, thought they could break OPEC by invading and occupying Iraq. Instead, the oil shieks are laughing all the way to the bank. Bush and Cheney will be o.k. but their policies are wrecking America and the U.S. dollar is plummeting. <br/> <br/> Only someone who is delusional would applaud this mess.<br/> <br/> A barrel of oil has reached $117. Could it be $200 before Bush and Cheney leave office? Attacking Iran is the recipe for $200/barrell.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/992212.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/992212.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:51:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Flat tax  for Social Security. FICA Tax on  investment income needed</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Many conservatives tout a flat income tax. Well, how about a flat tax on FICA? Few people realize that income after $95,000 is not taxed for FICA (Social Security taxes).<br/> <br/> And here's another thing few people realize. FICA taxes are not taken out for capital gains and dividend income. Taxing these income streams would fund Social Security forever.<br/> <br/> Where is the fairness in someone who sits around the swimming pool and waiting for dividend checks to arrive pays only 15% on that income whereas a coal miner or teacher pays 40% or more in total taxes?<br/> <br/> Greedy tycoons have rigged the system. Time to wake up, America.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/992210.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/992210.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:38:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Europe is no Utopia and no Model for the US, unless you're a liberal</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A common myth continually promoted on WOSU PBS is that somehow Europe is better than the US, and the most frequently stated reason is because of the GOVERNMENT HANDOUTS. Cuba has FREE healthcare to 100% of its people, does that make Cuba a Utopia, and look at teh tremendous costs involved let alone the complete loss of Freedom? Here some of the facts I will be addressing in future posts.<br/> <br/> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_European_Union" target="_blank" >http://en....pean_Union</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/991610.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/991610.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:55:56]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Al Qaeda No. 2: Attacks on Western nations in works</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Would you trust a Democrat to lead this Nation through a time of crisis? Or are we just setting the Democrats up for another failure of Biblical proportions?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/991609.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/991609.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:38:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>DTV basics</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ U.S. television stations will be required by law to turn off their analog channels and broadcast exclusively in the new digital format (DTV) effective February 17, 2009. Current WOSU TV reception will continue without interruption until that date.<br/> <br/> For more info, visit: <a href="http://www.wosu.org/televison/dtv/" target="_blank" >http://www.wosu.org/televison/dtv/</a><br/> <br/> Cable and Satellite:<br/> If you use your analog set with a multi-channel pay service such as satellite (DirecTV or DISH Network) or cable (Time Warner, Insight, or Wide Open West), you will continue to get local stations. The only exception would be if your cable/satellite service would go down for a period of time. The only way to be certain your reception is never interrupted is to purchase a digital converter box.<br/> <br/> Antenna:<br/> If you receive over-the-air programming by rabbit ears or another type of indoor or outdoor antenna and want to continue using your antenna, you will need either a digital television set or a digital converter box connected to each analog television set you use. Go here to get one: <a href="https://www.dtv2009.gov/" target="_blank" >https://www.dtv2009.gov/</a><br/> <br/> <br/> TVs with digital tuners:<br/> If you have a television set with a digital tuner, your television reception will continue uninterrupted. So, if you haven’t switched to digital yet, and you receive over-the-air television by rabbit ears or other type of indoor or outdoor antenna, you’ll need either a digital TV or a digital converter box connected to each analog television set you use so that you can continue to receive WOSU and other channels after February 17, 2009.<br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/988214.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/988214.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:40:30]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ sgowans]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Things Liberals Don't Teach in School</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ After watching Expelled: No Intelligence allowed, I thought it would be fun to start a thread to highlight all the other things you are deliberately not taught in liberal controlled schools. Post Your Favorites.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/984029.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/984029.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:07:06]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Understanding Intelligent Design</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Because this topic is taboo at universities, but is being exposed in Ben Stein's new movie Expelled; No Intelligence Allowed, I wanted to start the discussion. First of all, did you know Intelligent Design doesn't really have anything to do with God? It actually is a scientific theory THAT RELIES ON MATH AND SCIENCE? Something Darwin never did? Anyway, here is what I learned about ID, and was fascinated, mostly because of how they censored this legitimate scientific research. Read the first post for a detailed description of ID, and ask youself, why you can't discuss this at a University.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/984019.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/984019.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:01:25]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Totalitarian Leftists Gone Wild</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Post your favorite example of Totalitarian Leftists gone wild.<br/> <br/> Here are two Documentaries that make this case in phenomenal Fashion:<br/> <br/> Indoctrinate U and Expelled<br/> <br/> Expelled:<br/> <a href="http://www.expelledthemovie.com/" target="_blank" >http://www.expelledthemovie.com/</a><br/> <br/> Indoctrinate U:<br/> <a href="http://indoctrinate-u.com/pages/welcome.html" target="_blank" >http://ind...lcome.html</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/984016.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/984016.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:16:02]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Help Expose the Extreme Liberal Bias of WOSU</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ After posting a rough analysis of the weekly WOSU topics in the "Suggest a Topic" thread, I decided this topic deserved a thread of its own. I plan to use it to start qualifying the shows until there is enough evidence to convince friends in the Statistics, Economics, Mathematics or Sociology Depts to assign a few grad students to this study. Not surprising that this study hasn't already been done, that is what you expect from a Totalitarian Left organization. Some questions just can't be asked. Bottom line, I am 100% confident that any objective study of topics on WOSU will demonstrate an obscene leftward bias, that may be enough to convince OSU or Public Representitives that changes need to be made. Conservative pay taxes too. WOSU is not the tool of its leftist employees, WOSU is to SERVE the public, the whole public, not just the nut jobs on the left.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/983810.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/983810.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:20:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Nation was NOT better off under Democrats</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This was the myth published in the Dispatch:<br/> <br/> Since Jack Duffy thinks he understands "gall," let me point out his own when he calls the Democrats "big-spending do-gooders" ("Pelosi has nerve questioning general," letter, Wednesday). <br/> <br/> Under the Democratic administration before President Bush took office, the United States had a balanced budget and a booming economy. <br/> <br/> Under Bush's leadership, we are trillions of dollars in debt -- mostly to communist China, which can pull our strings anytime it chooses. This country under Bush has a recession looming and people losing jobs and homes. <br/> <br/> That equates to big spending, of borrowed money, with no good being done. <br/> <br/> Which would you rather have?<br/> <br/> MARGARET SCHUBBE <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> Powell <br/> <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/editorials/stories/2008/04/13/Schubbe_ART_04-13-08_G4_M29SRP4.html?sid=101" target="_blank" >http://www...ml?sid=101</a><br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/967609.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/967609.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:12:23]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Weaker dollar aiding Ohio; Manufacturers poised to profit from exports </title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This thread is to expose the dangerous ignorance of nit wit liberals. As the title demonstrates, trade is a 2 way street, with both sides winning, or losing. If we protect jobs in import industries like Autos, we lose jobs in export industries like agriculture and airlines. Problem is nit wit liberals only focus on the jobs lost due to imports, and not the jobs lost due to fewer exports, and the fact that everyone gets fewer choices, lower growth and higher inflation.<br/> <br/> ECONOMIC SILVER LINING <br/> Weaker dollar aiding Ohio<br/> Manufacturers poised to profit from exports <br/> Sunday,  April 13, 2008 3:39 AM <br/> By Gerry Shih<br/> <br/> COX NEWS SERVICE <br/> WASHINGTON -- Three months ago, as subprime mortgage and recession worries hit a fever pitch, one of Wall Street's most respected but notoriously gloomy economists intrigued investors by dropping a morsel of optimism.<br/> <br/> A sharp U.S. manufacturing renaissance, Merrill Lynch's David Rosenberg said, should flourish for at least five years.<br/> <br/> "This means a revival in the Rust Belt," he declared, and financial circles buzzed.<br/> <br/> To that jaded swath of America, it sounds like a familiar claim peddled by economists once every few years but that never pans out at home: Some estimate that 200,000 manufacturing jobs have left Ohio since 2000.<br/> <br/> But for the first time in decades, various economic and political factors appear to be converging in transforming the global currency order in the long run. If the dollar were to remain devalued, as some think, it could bring sweeping changes to the U.S. economic landscape and its manufacturing heartland.<br/> <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/business/stories/2008/04/13/ohio_revival_-_cox.ART_ART_04-13-08_D1_OB9TLHV.html?sid=101" target="_blank" >http://www...ml?sid=101</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/966613.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/966613.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:26:15]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>John McCain plan to end Employer-Based Health Insurance</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/19ba2f1c-c03f-4ac2-8cd5-5cf2edb527cf.htm" target="_blank" >http://joh...b527cf.htm</a><br/> Copy and pasted straight from John McBush's campaign website:<br/> <br/> "John McCain believes that insurance reforms should increase the variety and affordability of insurance coverage available to American families by fostering competition and innovation. <br/> Reform the tax code to eliminate the bias toward employer-sponsored health insurance, and provide all individuals with a $2,500 tax credit ($5,000 for families) to increase incentives for insurance coverage. Individuals owning innovative multi-year policies that cost less than the full credit can deposit remainder in expanded health savings accounts."<br/> <br/> The way I read this is that McBush would like to end tax incentives for Employers to help pay for employees health insurance. It's safe to say that CEO's won't go uncovered but McBush's plan would send tens of millions more Americans onto the uninsured rolls. <br/> <br/> Also, from McBush's website: <br/> <br/> "Make patients the center of care and give them a larger role in both prevention and care, putting more decisions and responsibility in their hands."<br/> <br/> Uh, no. Doctors should be the center of care. They get schooling and training for at least ten years. People are being bombarded by advertisements for expensive prescription drugs that don't sell well and most people don't need. McBush's plans will only make the medical care/insurance crisis much worse. <br/>  <br/> <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/965812.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/965812.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:31:44]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Impeach Bush/Cheney]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Hank Paulson or Pat Paulson---The only difference is that Pat made sense.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Henry Paulson just addressed the press after the G-7 meeting in Washington.  At the end of the press conference he was exhausted from stuttering out confused answers to questions he clearly could never answer given a 1000 hours of intense economic tutorials.  It was the most pathetic and obtuse message on the economy yet.  That aside, it is clear that the Bear Sterns bailout was hardly adequate to stem the continuing lack of confidence in the financial markets.  The intra bank lending markets have frozen up once again.  The distrust within the sector is clearly evident which means another bank of some significants is on the rocks.  <br/> <br/> Additionally, the IMF, hardly a liberal organization, has announced the anticipation of credit losses at nearly a trillion dollars.  That was quickly followed by an announcement by Nouriel Roubini, who has been on the bullseye with his predictions on this crisis in advance of the present dislocations, with a statement in which he now estimates the losses at $1.7 trillion in the credit markets.  <br/> <br/> These two announcements are targeting the losses from defaults on credit instruments only and not including the deflation of real estate assets which will be extraordinary.  <br/> ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/962809.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/962809.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:41:13]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ yancey]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Skybust - Who is to blame?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ After ten months and millions of dollars of taxpayer support, Skybus has failed. Who is to blame?  Skybus executives?  High fuel prices? City and state leaders? ]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/962010.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/962010.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:47:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mike Thompson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What do you think of Marc Dann?</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann has an eventful start to his term.  He's gotten a lot of publicity for fighting for what he calls, "the little guy."  He's also had setbacks, having to remove some key people for questionable ethics. Now he's being criticized for the way he handled a sexual harassment complain against a top aide and good friend.   <br/> <br/> What do you think of Marc Dann's performance?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/962009.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/962009.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:45:58]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Mike Thompson]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Democratic Tribes at War</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Two Faced Democrats are finally being exposed. From the election results it is clear which party is truly the party of racists and sexists. Democrats are legendary for calling conservatives racist and Nazis, but when it comes down to putting their vote where their mouths are, their two faced racism is clearly evident. <br/> <br/> Exit polls have shown that the contest between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama has produced deep divisions among Democratic constituencies. It looks something like tribal warfare. Whites have voted, if you average the results from the states, 53 percent to 39 percent for Clinton; blacks, 80 percent to 17 percent for Obama; Latinos, 58 percent to 39 percent for Clinton; Asians, in California (the one primary state where they're numerous enough to gauge), 71 percent to 25 percent for Clinton. <br/> <br/> The differences in voting by the young, overwhelmingly for Obama, and the elderly, overwhelmingly for Clinton, are as large as any I can remember in either a primary or general election. Upscale voters are heavily for Obama; downscale voters are heavily for Clinton. <br/> <a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MichaelBarone/2008/04/05/the_democratic_tribes_at_war" target="_blank" >http://www...bes_at_war</a>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/955810.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/955810.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:52:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Angry Bob]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Show idea: Community Theatre As A Political Vehicle</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Idea for a show: "When Community Theatre Has A Political Edge." <br/> Possible guest: Matt Slaybaugh and/or others from "Available light [theatre]." <a href="http://www.avltheatre.com/" target="_blank" >http://www.avltheatre.com/</a> <br/> <br/> As I am planning to present a production of Our Town (NOT politically edgy, I know), I've come to know these folks. They use theatre (shows never presented before in Columbus) to wake citizens to social action and engagement. It's more than a nice night out at the theatre. It's a call to action.<br/> <br/> Thanks, Fred!<br/> <br/> -- Artie Isaac<br/> 614-643-1006]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/955809.page</guid>
				<link>http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/wosu/posts/list/955809.page</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:46:37]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ Artie Isaac]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
